SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Scholarly Metrics Baseline: A Survey of Faculty Knowledge, Use, and Opinion about Scholarly Metrics
16 references·4 citing·46 second hop
Scholarly Metrics Baseline: A Survey of Faculty Knowledge, Use, and Opinion about Scholarly Metrics (2017)Scholarly Metrics Baseline: A Survey of F…A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)A review of the literature on…The Disaster of the Impact Factor (2014)The Disaster of the Impact Fa…Universality of scholarly impact metrics (2013)Universality of scholarly imp…Universality of scholarly impact metrics (2013)Universality of scholarly imp…The Google Scholar Experiment: How To Index False Papers And Manipulate Bibliometric Indicators (2013)The Google Scholar Experiment…The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators (2013)The G oogle scholar experimen…hIa: an individual annual h-index to accommodate disciplinary and career length differences (2013)hIa: an individual annual h-i…How implementation of bibliometric practice affects the role of academic libraries (2012)How implementation of bibliom…From bibliometrics to altmetrics: A changing scholarly landscape (2012)From bibliometrics to altmetr…The inconsistency of the h‐index (2011)The inconsistency of the h‐in…The h index research output measurement: Two approaches to enhance its accuracy (2010)The h index research output m…Metrics: Do metrics matter? (2010)Metrics: Do metrics matter?Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: From a research evaluation perspective (2008)Characteristics of research o…Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact (2006)Earlier Web usage statistics …Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Bibliometric monitoring of re…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Researchers’ attitudes towards the h-index on Twitter 2007–2020: criticism and acceptance (2021)Researchers’ attitudes toward…Assessing the Impact and Quality of Research Data Using Altmetrics and Other Indicators (2020)Assessing the Impact and Qual…How research becomes impact: Librarians helping faculty use scholarly metrics to select journals (2018)How research becomes impact: …Research Impact Metrics: A Faculty Perspective (2017)Research Impact Metrics: A Fa…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators (2014)Tourism and Sustainability: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis (2018)Exploratory Research (2020)Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002)Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation Impact (2006)Predictive effects of structural variation on citation counts (2011)How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of ‘alternative metrics’ in scientific publications (2014)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Does the h index have predictive power? (2007)A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field (2019)Exploring Topics in Bibliometric Research Through Citation Networks and Semantic Analysis (2021)What is research collaboration? (1997)A Bibliometric History of the Journal of Psychology Between 1936 and 2015 (2018)Does bibliometric research confer legitimacy to research assessment practice? A sociological study of reputational control, 1972-2016 (2018)The commercialized Australian public university: An accountingized transition (2021)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature (2007)A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator (2010)Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective (2013)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)How To Count Citations If You Must (2016)Evaluating Bibliometrics Reviews: A Practical Guide for Peer Review and Critical Reading (2025)The Hierarchy of the Sciences? (1983)Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases (2006)Accuracy and completeness of publication and citation records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: A case study for the computation of h indices in Psychology (2010)Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus (2011)The changing role of non-English papers in scholarly communication: Evidence from Web of Science's three journal citation indexes (2016)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)Measuring the societal impact of research (2012)The application of bibliometric analysis: disciplinary and user aspects (2018)The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2016A review of the literature on citation impact indicators1,344 cited
  • 2006Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review786 cited
  • 2006Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact402 cited
  • 2011The inconsistency of the h‐index344 cited
  • 2013The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators271 cited
  • 2010Metrics: Do metrics matter?261 cited
  • 2008Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: From a research evaluation perspective191 cited
  • 2013Universality of scholarly impact metrics97 cited
  • 2013hIa: an individual annual h-index to accommodate disciplinary and career length differences91 cited
  • 2013Universality of scholarly impact metrics90 cited
  • 2014The Disaster of the Impact Factor90 cited
  • 2010The h index research output measurement: Two approaches to enhance its accuracy81 cited
  • 2012From bibliometrics to altmetrics: A changing scholarly landscape71 cited
  • 2012How implementation of bibliometric practice affects the role of academic libraries

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

69 cited
  • 2013The Google Scholar Experiment: How To Index False Papers And Manipulate Bibliometric Indicators53 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Researchers’ attitudes towards the h-index on Twitter 2007–2020: criticism and acceptance20 cited
    • 2020Assessing the Impact and Quality of Research Data Using Altmetrics and Other Indicators17 cited
    • 2018How research becomes impact: Librarians helping faculty use scholarly metrics to select journals15 cited
    • 2017Research Impact Metrics: A Faculty Perspective11 cited