SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Is The Cochrane Collaboration Prepared for the Era of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research?
5 references·1 citing·31 second hop
Is The Cochrane Collaboration Prepared for the Era of Patient-Centred Outcomes Research? (2013)Is The Cochrane Collaboration Prepared fo…Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a systematic review of decision makers’ perceptions (2012)Barriers to the uptake of evi…The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute — Promoting Better Information, Decisions, and Health (2011)The Patient-Centered Outcomes…Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleve…Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting (2010)Clinical trials should begin …Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Neonatal Reviews: A systematic analysis (2006)Conclusiveness of the Cochran…Current State of Reporting Pain Outcomes in Cochrane Reviews of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions and Considerations for an OMERACT Research Agenda (2015)Current State of Reporting Pa…Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)Dialogue on Developing Consensus on Measurement and Presentation of Patient-important Outcomes, Using Pain Outcomes as an Exemplar, in Systematic Reviews: A Preconference Meeting at OMERACT 12 (2015)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)A Systematic Examination of the Citation of Prior Research in Reports of Randomized, Controlled Trials (2011)Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important? (2020)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Cochrane systematic reviews in the field of addiction: What's there and what should be (2010)High quality of evidence is uncommon in Cochrane systematic reviews in Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency Medicine (2017)Should low-quality evidence dominate high-level evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews of musculoskeletal physical therapy interventions (2020)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology (2016)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making (2005)How Can We Support the Use of Systematic Reviews in Policymaking? (2009)Interventions to improve the use of systematic reviews in decision-making by health system managers, policy makers and clinicians (2012)Using logic model methods in systematic review synthesis: describing complex pathways in referral management interventions (2014)Revisiones Sistemáticas Exploratorias como metodología para la síntesis del conocimiento científico (2020)Effect of mindfulness-based programmes on elite athlete mental health: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)Best Care at Lower Cost (2013)Validity and Responsiveness of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 Generic Core Scales in the Pediatric Inpatient Setting (2014)Understanding personalized dynamics to inform precision medicine: a dynamic time warp analysis of 255 depressed inpatients (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
  • 2011The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute — Promoting Better Information, Decisions, and Health199 cited
  • 2010Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting166 cited
  • 2012Barriers to the uptake of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a systematic review of decision makers’ perceptions116 cited
  • 2006Conclusiveness of the Cochrane Neonatal Reviews: A systematic analysis29 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Current State of Reporting Pain Outcomes in Cochrane Reviews of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions and Considerations for an OMERACT Research Agenda11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work