SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A quality assessment of randomized controlled trial reports in endodontics
16 references·10 citing·25 second hop
A quality assessment of randomized controlled trial reports in endodontics (2016)A quality assessment of randomized contro…SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and e…Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials (2011)Randomisation to protect agai…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and …Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)Comparison of Registered and …Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Does the CONSORT checklist im…Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2004)Clinical trial registration: …Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Does quality of reports of ra…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasAssessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…Critical analysis of the reporting quality of randomized trials within Endodontics using the Preferred Reporting Items for RAndomized Trials in Endodontics (PRIRATE) 2020 quality standard checklist (2021)Critical analysis of the repo…The reporting quality of split-mouth trials in orthodontics according to CONSORT guidelines: 2015–19 (2020)The reporting quality of spli…Quality of Split-Mouth Trials in Dentistry: 1998, 2008, and 2018 (2020)Quality of Split-Mouth Trials…Guidelines for reporting randomized controlled trials in paediatric dentistry based on the CONSORT statement (2020)Guidelines for reporting rand…Abstracts of published randomized controlled trials in Endodontics: reporting quality and spin (2020)Abstracts of published random…Risk of Bias and Its Impact on Intervention Effect Estimates of Randomized Controlled Trials in Endodontics (2019)Risk of Bias and Its Impact o…Preferred Reporting Items for RAndomized Trials in Endodontics ( PRIRATE ) guidelines: a development protocol (2019)Preferred Reporting Items for…Proposal of a stochastic model to determine the bibliometric variables influencing the quality of a journal: application to the field of Dentistry (2018)Proposal of a stochastic mode…Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Endodontics (2018)Methodological and Reporting …Citations for Randomized Controlled Trials in Sepsis Literature: The Halo Effect Caused by Journal Impact Factor (2017)Citations for Randomized Cont…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials6,239 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2009
Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials
728 cited
  • 2011Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials439 cited
  • 2004Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors408 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Endodontics33 cited
    • 2020Abstracts of published randomized controlled trials in Endodontics: reporting quality and spin33 cited
    • 2020Guidelines for reporting randomized controlled trials in paediatric dentistry based on the CONSORT statement26 cited
    • 2020Quality of Split-Mouth Trials in Dentistry: 1998, 2008, and 201823 cited
    • 2019Preferred Reporting Items for RAndomized Trials in Endodontics ( PRIRATE ) guidelines: a development protocol21 cited
    • 2020The reporting quality of split-mouth trials in orthodontics according to CONSORT guidelines: 2015–1921 cited
    • 2021Critical analysis of the reporting quality of randomized trials within Endodontics using the Preferred Reporting Items for RAndomized Trials in Endodontics (PRIRATE) 2020 quality standard checklist21 cited
    • 2018Proposal of a stochastic model to determine the bibliometric variables influencing the quality of a journal: application to the field of Dentistry20 cited
    • 2019Risk of Bias and Its Impact on Intervention Effect Estimates of Randomized Controlled Trials in Endodontics18 cited
    • 2017Citations for Randomized Controlled Trials in Sepsis Literature: The Halo Effect Caused by Journal Impact Factor15 cited