Alcohol, Sexual Arousal, and Sexually Aggressive Decision-Making: Preventative Strategies and Forensic Psychology Implications

Abstract

Rational choice theory outlines that human behavior is based on the perceived costs and benefits that will result from any given behavior. Before engaging in any behavior (criminal or not) the individual rationally weighs the costs and benefits associated with the outcome of the behavior. If the perceived benefits of the behavior outweigh the costs then the individual “rationally” chooses to engage in the behavior. This “rationality,” however, is compromised when individuals find themselves intoxicated and/or sexually aroused, especially in regards to sexually aggressive behavior. Alcohol-induced intoxication has repeatedly been associated with sexual aggression and/or rape. Based on the literature, sexual arousal too has been associated with an increased likelihood of self-reported male sexual forcefulness against female targets. Male perceptions of the legal and social consequences associated with sexually aggressing against, or raping, a female acquaintance are obscured when intoxicated, and to a lesser degree when they find themselves sexually aroused. Aggressive educational programs may help to curb the overwhelming rates of date/acquaintance rapes, especially if initiated early on in the public's academic or social careers. In addition, it is imperative then for the courts and psychologists dealing with sexually aggressive offenders to recognize the effects that alcohol-induced intoxication and sexual arousal may have had on the rational decision-making process of the perpetrator.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 11 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.