No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Imagine two theories in a scientific controversy cast as competing teams in the Super Bowl, and you may get a “Scoreboard of experimental evidence” such as the following, published in a review article in 1970 (after Racker 1970, 135): This figure compares two hypotheses in a debate in bioenergetics in the 1960s and 70s known as the Ox-Phos Controversy (Rowen 1986; Allchin 1990; Weber 1991). But its format, suggested by its title, bears a striking resemblance to the half-time recaps in televised football games: parallel assessments in several categories ask us to compare, say, how many yards rushed, number of first downs, passes completed, evidence for the role of the membrane, or evidence for ion transport, etc. (see also Sindermann 1982). Why did the review author—Efraim Racker, a research biochemist—borrow the scoreboard framework from sports to convey his assessment in science?
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 27 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.