SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015
14 references·16 citing·43 second hop
Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015 (2016)Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Bi…The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)The Extent and Consequences o…p -Curve and Effect Size (2014)p -Curve and Effect SizeP-curve: A key to the file-drawer. (2013)P-curve: A key to the file-dr…Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Negative results are disappea…Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Reporting and Interpretation …“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences (2010)“Positive” Results Increase D…An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings (2007)An exploratory test for an ex…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences (2005)Relative Citation Impact of V…A General Linear Model for Estimating Effect Size in the Presence of Publication Bias (1995)A General Linear Model for Es…The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)The earth is round (p < .05).Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Factors Influencing Publicati…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)Reducing bias, increasing tra…Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field (2022)Replication concerns in sport…Statistics in scientific articles published in the European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Diseases (2020)Statistics in scientific arti…Reducing bias and improving transparency in medical research: a critical overview of the problems, progress and suggested next steps (2020)Reducing bias and improving t…Estimating publication bias in meta‐analyses of peer‐reviewed studies: A meta‐meta‐analysis across disciplines and journal tiers (2020)Estimating publication bias i…What Have We (Not) Learnt from Millions of Scientific Papers with P Values? (2019)What Have We (Not) Learnt fro…Use of P-values and the terms “significant”, “non-significant” and “suggestive” in Abstracts in the European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Diseases (2019)Use of P-values and the terms…The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses (2019)The statistical significance …The New Statistics for Better Science: Ask How Much, How Uncertain, and What Else Is Known (2019)The New Statistics for Better…French scientific medical journals confronted by developments in medical writing and the transformation of the medical press (2019)French scientific medical jou…Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research (2019)Calibrating the Scientific Ec…Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure (2018)Modelling science trustworthi…The earth is flat ( p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research (2017)The earth is flat ( p > 0.05)…Replication in Criminology and the Social Sciences (2017)Replication in Criminology an…On Nomological Validity and Auxiliary Assumptions: The Importance of Simultaneously Testing Effects in Social Cognitive Theories Applied to Health Behavior and Some Guidelines (2017)On Nomological Validity and A…Improving transparency and reproducibility through registration: The status of intervention trials published in clinical psychology journals. (2016)Improving transparency and re…Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical Data (1988)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)The Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement (1996)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Does Cultural Competency Training of Health Professionals Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm for Future Research (2010)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial (2014)Belief in the law of small numbers. (1971)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists (2007)Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. (2011)The Logic of Scientific Discovery (2013)Estimating Psychological Networks and their Accuracy: A Tutorial Paper (2016)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses (2009)Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature (2017)Long-term outcomes of childhood sexual abuse: an umbrella review (2019)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Scientific Utopia (2012)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data (2015)The contact hypothesis re-evaluated (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)A power primer. (1992)Scientific method: Statistical errors (2014)Mini Meta‐Analysis of Your Own Studies: Some Arguments on Why and a Primer on How (2016)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The New Statistics (2013)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 1994The earth is round (p < .05).3,999 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 2013P-curve: A key to the file-drawer.1,501 cited
  • 2015The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science1,389 cited
  • 2011Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries1,215 cited
  • 1992Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results853 cited
  • 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes828 cited
  • 2007An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings751 cited
  • 2010“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences733 cited
  • 2014p -Curve and Effect Size713 cited
  • 2005Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences497 cited
  • 1995A General Linear Model for Estimating Effect Size in the Presence of Publication Bias415 cited

Cited by

  • 2017The earth is flat ( p > 0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

309 cited
  • 2018Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure225 cited
  • 2023Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration180 cited
  • 2019The New Statistics for Better Science: Ask How Much, How Uncertain, and What Else Is Known167 cited
  • 2019What Have We (Not) Learnt from Millions of Scientific Papers with P Values?159 cited
  • 2017Replication in Criminology and the Social Sciences148 cited
  • 2017On Nomological Validity and Auxiliary Assumptions: The Importance of Simultaneously Testing Effects in Social Cognitive Theories Applied to Health Behavior and Some Guidelines144 cited
  • 2019The statistical significance of meta-analyses is frequently fragile: definition of a fragility index for meta-analyses121 cited
  • 2019Use of P-values and the terms “significant”, “non-significant” and “suggestive” in Abstracts in the European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Diseases105 cited
  • 2019Calibrating the Scientific Ecosystem Through Meta-Research97 cited
  • 2022Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field92 cited
  • 2016Improving transparency and reproducibility through registration: The status of intervention trials published in clinical psychology journals.90 cited
  • 2019French scientific medical journals confronted by developments in medical writing and the transformation of the medical press89 cited
  • 2020Reducing bias and improving transparency in medical research: a critical overview of the problems, progress and suggested next steps88 cited
  • 2020Estimating publication bias in meta‐analyses of peer‐reviewed studies: A meta‐meta‐analysis across disciplines and journal tiers85 cited
  • 2020Statistics in scientific articles published in the European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology Head & Neck Diseases82 cited