SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Enhancing scholarly dialogue: Inviting Letters to the Editor
6 references·0 citing·21 second hop
Enhancing scholarly dialogue: Inviting Letters to the Editor (2016)Enhancing scholarly dialogue: Inviting Le…Letters to the editor: time for more scholarly debate (2014)Letters to the editor: time f…How to Build a Scientific Publishing Career Based on Hundreds of Letters-to-the-Editor: “The Art of Loss” (2011)How to Build a Scientific Pub…Adequacy of authors' replies to criticism raised in electronic letters to the editor: cohort study (2010)Adequacy of authors' replies …The role of correspondence sections in post-publication peer review: A bibliometric study of general and internal medicine journals (2009)The role of correspondence se…Helpful Hints: Writing Effective Letters to the Editor (2006)Helpful Hints: Writing Effect…The editor's correspondence: Analysis of patterns appearing in selected specialty and general journals (1983)The editor's correspondence: …Writing a letter to the Editor. (2010)La carta al editor en la publicación científica. Consideraciones para su elaboración (2021)Reinventing the Letter to the Editor in Science: A Dedicated Preprint Server (2025)Unvarnished viewpoints and scientific scrutiny. Letter to the editor provide a forum for readers and help make a journal accountable to the medical community. (1997)Letters: A Forum for Scientific Discourse (1999)How to write a critical letter and respond to one (2001)Writing a Letter to the Editor: Guidance From the Editors (2022)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do? (2002)Committee on publication ethics (2010)Scholarly communication and matters of trust and authority: A comparative analysis of Malaysian and Chinese researchers (2017)Post-publication peer review in biomedical journals: overcoming obstacles and disincentives to knowledge sharing (2018)The value of letters to the editor (2018)Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis (1989)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Designing next-generation platforms for evaluating scientific output: what scientists can learn from the social web (2012)Peer review in a rapidly evolving publishing landscape (2012)Understanding the nature and scope of clinical research commentaries in PubMed (2019)Article-by-article citation analysis of medical journals (1987)Los análisis de citas en la evaluación de los trabajos científicos y las publicaciones seriadas (1999)Write to Me Please: The Scholarly Importance of Letters to the Editor (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Adequacy of authors' replies to criticism raised in electronic letters to the editor: cohort study30 cited
  • 2009The role of correspondence sections in post-publication peer review: A bibliometric study of general and internal medicine journals20 cited
  • 2014Letters to the editor: time for more scholarly debate19 cited
  • 1983The editor's correspondence: Analysis of patterns appearing in selected specialty and general journals17 cited
  • 2011How to Build a Scientific Publishing Career Based on Hundreds of Letters-to-the-Editor: “The Art of Loss”14 cited
  • 2006Helpful Hints: Writing Effective Letters to the Editor10 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work