Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Gazing into the Crystal Ball: Can Jurors Accurately Predict Dangerousness in Capital Cases?

3 references·9 citing·48 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1983Predicting Violent Behavior: An Assessment of Clinical Techniques.500 cited
1988The Expert Witness in Psychology and Psychiatry314 cited
1982DANGEROUSNESS AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE158 cited

Cited by

2005Does psychopathy predict institutional misconduct among adults? A meta-analytic investigation.242 cited
2005An Actuarial Model for Assessment of Prison Violence Risk Among Maximum Security Inmates124 cited
1992Is it unethical to offer predictions of future violence?117 cited
2005Predictions of Future Dangerousness in Capital Murder Trials: Is It Time to "Disinvent the Wheel?"93 cited
2002Death row inmate characteristics, adjustment, and confinement: a critical review of the literature89 cited
2003Deliberating on dangerousness and death: jurors' ability to differentiate between expert actuarial and clinical predictions of dangerousness49 cited
2009Capital jury decision-making: The limitations of predictions of future violence.34 cited
2010Life and death in the lone star state: Three decades of violence predictions by capital juries26 cited
2013Probability of Criminal Acts of Violence: A Test of Jury Predictive Accuracy19 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work