SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The missing metric: quantifying contributions of reviewers
16 references·6 citing·35 second hop
The missing metric: quantifying contributions of reviewers (2015)The missing metric: quantifying contribut…Science for sale: the rise of predatory journals (2014)Science for sale: the rise of…Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age (2012)The weakening relationship be…Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…Metrics: Do metrics matter? (2010)Metrics: Do metrics matter?Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (2010)Measuring contextual citation…h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields (2009)h-Index: A review focused in …An Incentive Solution to the Peer Review Problem (2007)An Incentive Solution to the …The Impact Factor Game (2006)The Impact Factor GameThe h index and career assessment by numbers (2006)The h index and career assess…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…The politics of publication (2003)The politics of publicationMaking Reviewers Visible (2002)Making Reviewers VisibleAdvantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance (2002)Advantages and limitations in…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…A technique for measurement of attitudes (1932)A technique for measurement o…Engagement of early career researchers in collaborative assessments of IPCC reports: achievements and insights (2024)Engagement of early career re…Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting peer reviewers for their contribution to science (2023)Where are the carrots? A prop…Preserving the Quality of Scientific Research: Peer Review of Research Articles (2017)Preserving the Quality of Sci…Addressing Reproducibility: Peer Review, Impact Factors, Checklists, Guidelines, and Reproducibility Initiatives (2017)Addressing Reproducibility: P…A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science (2017)A prospective study on an inn…Increasing challenges for an effective peer-review process (2016)Increasing challenges for an …Citation Statistics from 110 Years of Physical Review (2005)Index aims for fair ranking of scientists (2005)Gender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance (2006)Gender-Heterogeneous Working Groups Produce Higher Quality Science (2013)Research Weaving: Visualizing the Future of Research Synthesis (2018)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics (2015)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Does the h index have predictive power? (2007)An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators (2014)25years at Knowledge-Based Systems: A bibliometric analysis (2015)Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact (2016)Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect (2004)Analyzing Likert Data (2012)Research Methods in Psychology (2016)Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities (2005)When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings (2009)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? (2011)The Altmetrics Collection (2012)Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 1932A technique for measurement of attitudes9,567 cited
  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
  • 2009h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields849 cited
  • 2010Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals624 cited
  • 2006The h index and career assessment by numbers400 cited
  • 2006The Impact Factor Game372 cited
  • 2003The politics of publication359 cited
  • 2002Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance302 cited
  • 2012The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age292 cited
  • 2010Metrics: Do metrics matter?261 cited
  • 2007An Incentive Solution to the Peer Review Problem175 cited
  • 2002Making Reviewers Visible167 cited
  • 2014

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Science for sale: the rise of predatory journals
165 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Preserving the Quality of Scientific Research: Peer Review of Research Articles15 cited
  • 2017Addressing Reproducibility: Peer Review, Impact Factors, Checklists, Guidelines, and Reproducibility Initiatives11 cited
  • 2023Where are the carrots? A proposal to start crediting peer reviewers for their contribution to science9 cited
  • 2016Increasing challenges for an effective peer-review process9 cited
  • 2024Engagement of early career researchers in collaborative assessments of IPCC reports: achievements and insights7 cited
  • 2017A prospective study on an innovative online forum for peer reviewing of surgical science7 cited