SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
To meta-analyze or not to meta-analyze? A combined meta-analysis of N-of-1 trial data with RCT data on amphetamines and methylphenidate for pediatric ADHD
4 references·0 citing·23 second hop
To meta-analyze or not to meta-analyze? A combined meta-analysis of N-of-1 trial data with RCT data on amphetamines and methylphenidate for pediatric ADHD (2016)To meta-analyze or not to meta-analyze? A…CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: explanation and elaboration (2015)CONSORT extension for reporti…Meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data (2007)Meta‐analysis of continuous o…External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)External validity of randomis…Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? (1993)Meta-analysis of the literatu…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement (2015)The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement (2016)The consecutive controlled case series: Design, data‐analytics, and reporting methods supporting the study of generality (2020)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Suicide as an outcome for mental disorders (1997)Excess mortality of mental disorder (1998)How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies (2015)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)The Role of Behavioral Science Theory in Development and Implementation of Public Health Interventions (2010)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated (1994)Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression (2002)Multivariate Meta-Analysis: The Effect of Ignoring Within-Study Correlation (2009)Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature (2012)Random effects meta‐analysis: Coverage performance of 95 % confidence and prediction intervals following REML estimation (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”2,541 cited
  • 1993Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference?769 cited
  • 2007Meta‐analysis of continuous outcomes combining individual patient data and aggregate data280 cited
  • 2015CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015: explanation and elaboration143 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work