SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Levels of Evidence at the Orthopaedic Trauma Association Annual Meetings
9 references·0 citing·38 second hop
Levels of Evidence at the Orthopaedic Trauma Association Annual Meetings (2013)Levels of Evidence at the Orthopaedic Tra…Introducing Levels of Evidence to the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma (2012)Introducing Levels of Evidenc…Levels of Evidence at the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Annual Meetings (2010)Levels of Evidence at the Ped…Level of Evidence in Spine Compared to Other Orthopedic Journals (2007)Level of Evidence in Spine Co…A Practical Guide to Assigning Levels of Evidence (2007)A Practical Guide to Assignin…Interobserver Agreement in the Application of Levels of Evidence to Scientific Papers in the American Volume of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (2004)Interobserver Agreement in th…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis (1992)Incorporating variations in t…A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)A method for assessing the qu…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Measurement of Observer A…Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? (2006)International ranking systems for universities and institutions: a critical appraisal (2007)Publication Bias in Orthopaedic Research: An Analysis of Scientific Factors Associated with Publication in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) (2008)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1 (1987)Assessing the Quality of Randomized Trials (1999)Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables. (2010)INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL (2003)LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS (2005)Reading and Reviewing the Orthopaedic Literature: A Systematic, Evidence-based Medicine Approach (2005)Understanding Levels of Evidence for Scientific Communication (2010)A Practical Guide to Research: Design, Execution, and Publication (2011)Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Annual Congress of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery (2011)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Level of clinical evidence presented at the International Society for Hip Arthroscopy Annual Scientific Meeting over 5 years (2010–2014) (2015)Level of clinical evidence presented at the open and closed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons annual meeting over 10 years (2005–2014) (2016)Level of evidence of free papers presented at the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy congress from 2008 to 2016 (2016)Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)The Levels of Evidence in Pediatric Orthopaedic Journals (2011)Level of evidence of clinical spinal research and its correlation with journal impact factor (2013)Characteristics and Trends of the Most Cited Spine Publications (2020)Levels of Evidence in Orthopaedic Trauma Literature (2016)Publication integrity in orthopaedic journals: the self-citation in orthopaedic research (SCOR) threshold (2019)Assessing the level of evidence in the orthopaedic literature, 2013–2018: a review of 3449 articles in leading orthopaedic journals (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1977The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data81,000 cited
  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial1,349 cited
  • 1992Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis640 cited
  • 2004Interobserver Agreement in the Application of Levels of Evidence to Scientific Papers in the American Volume of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery100 cited
  • 2007A Practical Guide to Assigning Levels of Evidence84 cited
  • 2012Introducing Levels of Evidence to the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma52 cited
  • 2007Level of Evidence in Spine Compared to Other Orthopedic Journals41 cited
  • 2010Levels of Evidence at the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Annual Meetings18 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work