Axiomatics in Economics

Abstract

A correspondent who heard me talk last year about Economics as an Inductive Science interpreted me as saying axiomatic theories are useless. Since I neither said nor intended to say anything of the sort, I answered him to that effect, and shortly after received a second note to inform me that in any event my published address [13] did little but disparage neowalrasian theory, a charge I had no wish to deny. So his question was Why did you so disparage neowalrasian analysis?, and my answer was: Because I think neowalrasian' theory has been generally deleterious to the advancement of economic science. Although that remark is dated, the sentiment it expresses has not changed. I know my 1993 address struck some as concerned more with generalities than specifics; so I have no one but myself to blame if what I considered refutations were regarded by some as fulminations [57, 96]. In the discussion that follows, I focus on specifics, hoping thereby to persuade readers that my unsupportive attitude towards neowalrasian theory deserves to be emulated by all thoughtful economists.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 69 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.