'Moral Panic' and Moral Language in the Media

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive survey of the use of the term «moral panic» from its coinage in 1972 until the present day. It traces the evolution of the term in academic sociology and criminology, its adoption by the media in the mid-1980s and its subsequent employment in the national press. It shows how and why the term changed its meaning, and how far its use in academic discourse affected its use in the media. The article traces the development of «moral panic» in the media, where it was first used pejoratively, then rejected for being pejorative, and finally rehabilitated as a term of approval. It explains why the term developed as it did : how it enabled journalists to justify the moral and social role of the media, and also to support the reassertion of «family values» in the early 1990s. The article concludes by considering the relationship between «moral panic» and moral language in general. This is a more speculative analysis of the term, drawing on the work of moral philosophers and attempting to predict how «moral panic» may develop in the future. «Moral panic», he suggests, is an unsatisfactory form of moral language which may adversely affect the media's ability to handle moral issues seriously

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 179 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.