Inductivist Versus Deductivist Approaches in the Philosophy of Science as Illustrated by Some Controversies Between Whewell and Mill

Gerd Buchdahl

36 citations0/0 files storedThe Monist

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophy, Science, and History Philosophy and History of Science Literary, Cultural, Historical Analysis

Abstract

Gerd Buchdahl; Inductivist Versus Deductivist Approaches in the Philosophy of Science as Illustrated By Some Controversies Between Whewell and Mill*, The Monist

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 36 citations exist upstream.

References

1963The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 1979An Examination of Sir William Hamilton's Philosophy

Cited by

1972Methodological aspects of Kepler's theory of refraction 1991John Stuart Mill on Induction and Hypotheses 2016Mill's Philosophy of Science 1989History, Discovery and Induction: Whewell on Kepler on the Orbit of Mars 1985Necessary and contingent truth in William Whewell's antithetical theory of knowledge 1983Whewell and Mill on the relation between philosophy of science and history of science 1983William Whewell and John Stuart Mill on the methodology of political economy 2008“The Whole Box of Tools”: William Whewell and the Logic of Induction

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.