References

• 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
• 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
• 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
• 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
• 2007Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis1,879 cited
• 1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited
• 2008Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses1,117 cited
• 2009Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses940 cited
• 2008Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive—Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses917 cited
• 2013Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses881 cited
• 2001The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis.716 cited
• 2013The Impact of Study Size on Meta-analyses: Examination of Underpowered Studies in Cochrane Reviews672 cited
• 1997