SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reviewing the literature, how systematic is systematic?
16 references·16 citing·32 second hopsampled
Reviewing the literature, how systematic is systematic? (2016)Reviewing the literature, how systematic …Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings (2015)Methods of Meta-Analysis: Cor…Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense (2012)Why prospective registration …The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews (2012)The nuts and bolts of PROSPER…An analysis of quality of systematic reviews on pharmacist health interventions (2011)An analysis of quality of sys…Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's gui…Identifying and Avoiding Bias in Research (2010)Identifying and Avoiding Bias…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)AMSTAR is a reliable and vali…A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)A typology of reviews: an ana…Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Consolidated criteria for rep…Methods of Meta-Analysis (2004)Methods of Meta-AnalysisImproving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Mejorando la calidad de las publicaciones y avanzando en todos los paradigmas de la investigación de la farmacia asistencial, clínica y social: las declaraciones de Granada (2023)Mejorando la calidad de las p…Mejora de la Calidad de las Publicaciones y Avance en los Paradigmas de la Investigación en Farmacia Práctica Clínica y Social: La Declaración de Granada (2023)Mejora de la Calidad de las P…Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada Statements (2023)Improving the quality of publ…Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: the Granada Statements (2023)Improving the quality of publ…Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: the Granada Statements (2023)Improving the quality of publ…Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada statements (2023)Improving the quality of publ…Improving the Quality of Publications in and Advancing the Paradigms of Clinical and Social Pharmacy Practice Research: The Granada Statements (2023)Improving the Quality of Publ…Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada statements (2023)Improving the quality of publ…Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada statements (2023)Improving the quality of publ…Improving the Quality of Publications in and Advancing the Entire Paradigms of Clinical and Social Pharmacy Practice Research: The Granada Statements (2023)Improving the Quality of Publ…Reviews of Literature in Nursing Research (2022)Reviews of Literature in Nurs…Implications of Social Cohesion in Entrepreneurial Collaboration: a Systematic Literature Review (2021)Implications of Social Cohesi…How to Write a Systematic Review: A Narrative Review (2021)How to Write a Systematic Rev…Development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed (2021)Development of an efficient s…Mapping the characteristics of meta-analyses of pharmacy services: a systematic review (2020)Mapping the characteristics o…Methodological quality assessment of network meta-analysis of drug interventions: implications from a systematic review (2018)Methodological quality assess…Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1984)The theory of planned behavior (1991)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews (2014)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Oxford English dictionary (2004)The Oxford English Dictionary Online (2004)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study (2013)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Thematic Analysis (2017)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS (1991)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement63,979 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 2007Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups42,389 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation13,108 cited
  • 2009A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies10,781 cited
  • 2015Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings5,540 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 2010Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care3,245 cited
  • 2004Methods of Meta-Analysis3,023 cited
  • 2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited
  • 2012The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews1,430 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2010Identifying and Avoiding Bias in Research1,076 cited
  • 2012Why prospective registration of systematic reviews makes sense374 cited
  • 2011An analysis of quality of systematic reviews on pharmacist health interventions67 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021How to Write a Systematic Review: A Narrative Review47 cited
    • 2023Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: the Granada Statements42 cited
    • 2018Methodological quality assessment of network meta-analysis of drug interventions: implications from a systematic review39 cited
    • 2021Development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed38 cited
    • 2023Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada statements33 cited
    • 2022Reviews of Literature in Nursing Research31 cited
    • 2021Implications of Social Cohesion in Entrepreneurial Collaboration: a Systematic Literature Review24 cited
    • 2023Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada statements22 cited
    • 2023Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: the Granada Statements22 cited
    • 2023Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada statements21 cited
    • 2023Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada Statements20 cited
    • 2023Improving the Quality of Publications in and Advancing the Entire Paradigms of Clinical and Social Pharmacy Practice Research: The Granada Statements18 cited
    • 2023Improving the Quality of Publications in and Advancing the Paradigms of Clinical and Social Pharmacy Practice Research: The Granada Statements17 cited
    • 2020Mapping the characteristics of meta-analyses of pharmacy services: a systematic review17 cited
    • 2023Mejora de la Calidad de las Publicaciones y Avance en los Paradigmas de la Investigación en Farmacia Práctica Clínica y Social: La Declaración de Granada16 cited
    • 2023Mejorando la calidad de las publicaciones y avanzando en todos los paradigmas de la investigación de la farmacia asistencial, clínica y social: las declaraciones de Granada13 cited