Reply to Commentators

Timothy L. Williamson

52 citations0/0 files storedPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics Philosophy and Theoretical Science Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications

Abstract

In their intriguing comments, Paul Horwich and Stephen Schiffer accept one main thesis of Vagueness, that vague sentences express true or false propositions in borderline cases. Neither of them denies the further thesis that we cannot know which truth-values those propositions have. Of course I will concentrate on their objections to more specific features of my view, hoping that this will not obscure the many points of agreement.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 52 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2006Vagueness and the Metaphysics of Consciousness 2007Are Our Concepts conscious state and conscious creature Vague?2011Semantic plasticity and epistemicism 2016Epistemicism, Distribution, and the Argument from Vagueness 2004The Instability of Vague Terms 2002An Anti‐Epistemicist Consequence of Margin for Error Semantics for Knowledge 2019Incoherentism and the Sorites Paradox 2019Epistemicism and the Sorites Paradox

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.