SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Comprehensive Analysis of Articles Retracted Between 2004 and 2013 from Biomedical Literature – A Call for Reforms
12 references·9 citing·37 second hop
A Comprehensive Analysis of Articles Retracted Between 2004 and 2013 from Biomedical Literature – A Call for Reforms (2014)A Comprehensive Analysis of Articles Retr…Knowledge and Attitude of Dental Professionals of North India toward Plagiarism (2014)Knowledge and Attitude of Den…Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Why Has the Number of Scienti…Visibility of retractions: a cross-sectional one-year study (2013)Visibility of retractions: a …Correction: Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Correction: Why Has the Numbe…Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008 (2011)Why and how do journals retra…Retracted Science and the Retraction Index (2011)Retracted Science and the Ret…Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2009)Retractions: guidance from th…Retraction rates are on the rise (2008)Retraction rates are on the r…Empirical developments in retraction (2008)Empirical developments in ret…Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes? (2006)Retractions in the research l…Retraction policies of high-impact biomedical journals. (2004)Retraction policies of high-i…Phenomena of Retraction (1998)Phenomena of RetractionThe Citation of Retracted Papers and Impact on the Integrity of the Scientific Biomedical Literature (2025)The Citation of Retracted Pap…How do tweeters feel about scientific misinformation: an infoveillance sentiment analysis of tweets on retraction notices and retracted papers (2023)How do tweeters feel about sc…Expert-recommended biomedical journal articles: Their retractions or corrections, and post-retraction citing (2022)Expert-recommended biomedical…Recommendations from the Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: Shaping a Research and Implementation Agenda Project (2021)Recommendations from the Redu…A Survey of Iranian Retracted Publications Indexed in PubMed (2021)A Survey of Iranian Retracted…Retracted articles in rehabilitation: just the tip of the iceberg? A bibliometric analysis (2020)Retracted articles in rehabil…Journal Retraction Rates and Citation Metrics: An Ouroboric Association? (2020)Journal Retraction Rates and …How do academia and society react to erroneous or deceitful claims? The case of retracted articles’ recognition (2020)How do academia and society r…Correcting duplicate publications: follow up study of MEDLINE tagged duplications (2018)Correcting duplicate publicat…Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case (2006)Concern noted: a descriptive study of editorial expressions of concern in PubMed and PubMed Central (2017)How to write an article: An introduction to basic scientific medical writing (2018)Research ethics: a profile of retractions from world class universities (2021)International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (1990)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey (2017)Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data (2020)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Analysis of retracted articles in the surgical literature (2017)Searching for new breakthroughs in science: How effective are computerised detection algorithms? (2018)Data integrity of 35 randomised controlled trials in women’ health (2020)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications (2016)Exploratory Research (2020)Scientists behaving badly (2005)A survey of retracted articles in dentistry (2017)An analysis of the validity of retraction annotation in pubmed and the web of science (2017)Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices (2023)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Human Error (1990)Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors (2018)The ethics of scholarly publishing: exploring differences in plagiarism and duplicate publication across nations (2014)Replication studies in economics—How many and which papers are chosen for replication, and why? (2018)The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019 (2019)The "impact factor" revisited (2005)The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science (2013)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)Post retraction citations in context: a case study (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?415 cited
  • 2011Retracted Science and the Retraction Index405 cited
  • 2011Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008263 cited
  • 1998Phenomena of Retraction230 cited
  • 2006Retractions in the research literature: misconduct or mistakes?161 cited
  • 2008Retraction rates are on the rise149 cited
  • 2008Empirical developments in retraction91 cited
  • 2013Correction: Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?73 cited
  • 2013Visibility of retractions: a cross-sectional one-year study69 cited
  • 2009Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)60 cited
  • 2004Retraction policies of high-impact biomedical journals.59 cited
  • 2014Knowledge and Attitude of Dental Professionals of North India toward Plagiarism42 cited

Cited by

  • 2020Retracted articles in rehabilitation: just the tip of the iceberg? A bibliometric analysis20 cited
  • 2021A Survey of Iranian Retracted Publications Indexed in PubMed20 cited
  • 2025The Citation of Retracted Papers and Impact on the Integrity of the Scientific Biomedical Literature

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

14 cited
  • 2021Recommendations from the Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: Shaping a Research and Implementation Agenda Project13 cited
  • 2018Correcting duplicate publications: follow up study of MEDLINE tagged duplications13 cited
  • 2020How do academia and society react to erroneous or deceitful claims? The case of retracted articles’ recognition12 cited
  • 2023How do tweeters feel about scientific misinformation: an infoveillance sentiment analysis of tweets on retraction notices and retracted papers10 cited
  • 2020Journal Retraction Rates and Citation Metrics: An Ouroboric Association?10 cited
  • 2022Expert-recommended biomedical journal articles: Their retractions or corrections, and post-retraction citing8 cited