SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparing the Incommensurable: Constitutional Principles, Balancing and Rational Decision
0 references·4 citing·14 second hop
Comparing the Incommensurable: Constitutional Principles, Balancing and Rational Decision (2011)Comparing the Incommensurable: Constituti…Proportionality and Justification (2019)Proportionality and Justifica…O PROFETA, OS DISCÍPULOS E O “ENVIADO”: COMENTÁRIOS A VIRGÍLIO AFONSO DA SILVA (2019)O PROFETA, OS DISCÍPULOS E O …A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing (2017)A Critique of Proportionality…PONDERAÇÃO DE DIREITOS E PROPORCIONALIDADE DAS DECISÕES JUDICIAIS (2014)PONDERAÇÃO DE DIREITOS E PROP…Taking Rights Seriously (1977)The cost of rights: why liberty depends on taxes (1999)A Theory of Constitutional Rights (2002)The Concept of Law (1961)Between Facts and Norms (1996)Anarchy, State, and Utopia (2018)Eternity Clauses in Democratic Constitutionalism (2021)To Balance or Not to Balance: The Quest for the Essence of Rights (2021)A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF RATIONAL CHOICE (1955)Rational choice and the structure of the environment. (1956)19. The Second Treatise of Government (2016)Between facts and norms: contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (1997)Empiricism and the philosophy of mind (1997)The Core of the Case against Judicial Review (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2017A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing108 cited
  • 2019Proportionality and Justification15 cited
  • 2019O PROFETA, OS DISCÍPULOS E O “ENVIADO”: COMENTÁRIOS A VIRGÍLIO AFONSO DA SILVA11 cited
  • 2014PONDERAÇÃO DE DIREITOS E PROPORCIONALIDADE DAS DECISÕES JUDICIAIS8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work