SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Publishers withdraw more than 120 gibberish papers
2 references·16 citing·58 second hop
Publishers withdraw more than 120 gibberish papers (2014)Publishers withdraw more than 120 gibberi…The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators (2013)The G oogle scholar experimen…Duplicate and fake publications in the scientific literature: how many SCIgen papers in computer science? (2012)Duplicate and fake publicatio…Global retractions due to randomly generated content: Characterization and trends (2024)Global retractions due to ran…Post-publication Peer Review with an Intention to Uncover Data/Result Irregularities and Potential Research Misconduct in Scientific Research: Vigilantism or Volunteerism? (2023)Post-publication Peer Review …What Makes Writing Academic (2022)What Makes Writing AcademicPrevalence of nonsensical algorithmically generated papers in the scientific literature (2021)Prevalence of nonsensical alg…Deep Time Reckoning (2020)Deep Time ReckoningScientific integrity issues in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: Improving research reproducibility, credibility, and transparency (2019)Scientific integrity issues i…Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)Academic Misconduct, Misrepre…Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Editor Behavior through Potentially Coercive Citations (2017)Quantitative and Qualitative …Enhancing reproducibility: Failures from Reproducibility Initiatives underline core challenges (2017)Enhancing reproducibility: Fa…Your Paper has been Accepted, Rejected, or Whatever: Automatic Generation of Scientific Paper Reviews (2016)Your Paper has been Accepted,…The Rise of Predatory Publishing: How To Avoid Being Scammed (2016)The Rise of Predatory Publish…Grand Challenges in Measuring and Characterizing Scholarly Impact (2016)Grand Challenges in Measuring…The evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication: directional selection towards a robust discipline? (2015)The evolution of peer review …Strategies towards Evaluation beyond Scientific Impact. Pathways not only for Agricultural Research (2015)Strategies towards Evaluation…Comparing the topological properties of real and artificially generated scientific manuscripts (2015)Comparing the topological pro…Editorial Essay: Why Do We Still Have Journals? (2014)Editorial Essay: Why Do We St…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators (2014)Tourism and Sustainability: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis (2018)Exploratory Research (2020)Strong Inference (1964)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Free editors and peers: squeezing the lemon dry (2016)Article-processing charges as a barrier for science in low-to-medium income regions (2022)Comparing human and AI expertise in the academic peer review process: towards a hybrid approach (2025)The Numerical Measure of the Success of Predictions (1884)Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists (2009)Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis (2010)Striking similarities between publications from China describing single gene knockdown experiments in human cancer cell lines (2016)Assisting academics to identify computer generated writing (2022)Exploratory analysis of text duplication in peer-review reveals peer-review fraud and paper mills (2022)Citation Analysis: A Comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science (2006)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Text Mining Infrastructure in R (2008)Simple versus complex forecasting: The evidence (2015)Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? (2020)Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT , in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills (2023)Science publishing: The trouble with retractions (2011)Brazilian citation scheme outed (2013)Citation classics published in Knowledge Management journals. Part II: studying research trends and discovering the Google Scholar Effect (2015)Editorial Essay (2015)Citation-Based Journal Rankings: Key Questions, Metrics, and Data Sources (2017)Simulacra and Simulation (1995)False-Positive Psychology (2011)1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)Methods to account for citation inflation in research evaluation (2019)What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity (2020)AI and Academic Integrity: Exploring Student Perceptions and Implications for Higher Education (2025)Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments (1984)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The spread of true and false news online (2018)Testing an active intervention to deter researchers’ use of questionable research practices (2019)Transdisciplinary science and the importance of Indigenous knowledge (2023)Is gold open access helpful for academic purification? A causal inference analysis based on retracted articles in biochemistry (2024)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (1964)Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity (1979)Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (2011)Nuclear Cultural Heritage: From Energy Past to Heritage Future (2023)The Politics of Deep Time (2023)Geographies of storage (2024)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Is ChatGPT a valid author? (2023)Fake publications in biomedical science: red-flagging method indicates mass production (2025)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (1964)Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective (1988)limits of translingualism (2022)Collective Writing: The Continuous Struggle for Meaning-Making (2023)The First Time I Heard: Black Feminist Approaches to Hip Hop Methodologies (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators271 cited
  • 2012Duplicate and fake publications in the scientific literature: how many SCIgen papers in computer science?132 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment130 cited
  • 2020Deep Time Reckoning88 cited
  • 2021Prevalence of nonsensical algorithmically generated papers in the scientific literature83 cited
  • 2015Comparing the topological properties of real and artificially generated scientific manuscripts65 cited
  • 2014Editorial Essay: Why Do We Still Have Journals?60 cited
  • 2019Scientific integrity issues in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: Improving research reproducibility, credibility, and transparency54 cited
  • 2022What Makes Writing Academic43 cited
  • 2015The evolution of peer review as a basis for scientific publication: directional selection towards a robust discipline?34 cited
  • 2017Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Editor Behavior through Potentially Coercive Citations30 cited
  • 2016Grand Challenges in Measuring and Characterizing Scholarly Impact29 cited
  • 2023Post-publication Peer Review with an Intention to Uncover Data/Result Irregularities and Potential Research Misconduct in Scientific Research: Vigilantism or Volunteerism?29 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2017
Enhancing reproducibility: Failures from Reproducibility Initiatives underline core challenges
28 cited
  • 2024Global retractions due to randomly generated content: Characterization and trends28 cited
  • 2016Your Paper has been Accepted, Rejected, or Whatever: Automatic Generation of Scientific Paper Reviews28 cited
  • 2016The Rise of Predatory Publishing: How To Avoid Being Scammed25 cited
  • 2015Strategies towards Evaluation beyond Scientific Impact. Pathways not only for Agricultural Research23 cited