What prompts users to click and comment: A longitudinal study of online news
Abstract
This study examined the relationship between two mechanisms of online participation – clicking and commenting – as well as the characteristics of heavily clicked versus highly commented-upon news items. Based on 15,431 items from a popular Israeli website, correlations between clicking and commenting were calculated for 12 separately analysed months from 2006 to 2011. In addition, overlap rates were determined, showing that 40–59% of the heavily clicked items in any given month were different from the highly commented-upon items. A subsequent content analysis indicated that while sensational topics and curiosity-arousing elements were more prominent among the heavily clicked items than among the highly commented-upon items, political/social topics and controversial elements were more prominent among the highly commented-upon items. The study contributes to deepening our understanding of the role of user comments in constructing social/group identity and offers a new perspective on a prolonged controversy surrounding audiences’ news preferences.
Cite this
Ori Tenenboim, Akiba A. Cohen (2013). What prompts users to click and comment: A longitudinal study of online news. Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913513996
@article{ori2013what,
title = {What prompts users to click and comment: A longitudinal study of online news},
author = {Tenenboim, Ori and Cohen, Akiba A.},
year = {2013},
journal = {Journalism},
doi = {10.1177/1464884913513996}
}Citations in this library
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 191 citations exist upstream.