Arrow-Dot Measures of Impulse, Ego, and Superego Functions in Noncheaters, Cheaters and Supercheaters

Samuel Roll · Paula T. Hertel

6 citations0/0 files storedPerceptual and Motor Skills

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Personality Traits and Psychology Deception detection and forensic psychology

Abstract

Impulse, Ego, and Superego scales of the Arrow-Dot test and the Psychopathic Deviance scale of the MMPI were correlated with a measure of resistance to temptation. Using 76 college males, positive correlations ( p < .05 and p < .001) were found between the Impulse scores and yielding to temptation and the Ego scores and resistance to temptation. The correlations of the Psychopathic Deviance scale with both the Arrow-Dot test and the behavioral measure were not significant. The study provides evidence for the predictive validity of the Arrow-Dot test.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

References

1951Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, Manual.1958THE IES TEST 1966A Factor Analytic Approach to Impulse as Measured by Arrow Dot I, Q , and Sort 1971Relationships among Arrow-Dot IES Scores and Wechsler IQS and MMPI Scales for Hospitalized, Disturbed Adolescents

Cited by

2004Academic dishonesty: a study in the magnitude of and justifications for academic dishonesty among college undergraduate and graduate students

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.