SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic Reviews Addressing Microsurgical Head and Neck Reconstruction
14 references·1 citing·47 second hop
Systematic Reviews Addressing Microsurgical Head and Neck Reconstruction (2014)Systematic Reviews Addressing Microsurgic…The Quality of Systematic Reviews in Hand Surgery (2013)The Quality of Systematic Rev…Methodological Concerns and Quality Appraisal of Contemporary Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Pediatric Urology (2011)Methodological Concerns and Q…Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature From 1998 to 2008 (2010)Assessment of the Methodologi…A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality of Meta-analyses in Endodontics (2010)A Systematic Evaluation of th…Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology – A systematic review (2009)Quality of systematic reviews…Evidence-Based Plastic Surgery (2009)Evidence-Based Plastic SurgeryAMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)AMSTAR is a reliable and vali…External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) (2007)External Validation of a Meas…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews (2006)Single data extraction genera…Half-life of truth in surgical literature (1997)Half-life of truth in surgica…Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Rationale…A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts (1992)A Comparison of Results of Me…The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)The Medical Review Article: S…The Quality of Systematic Reviews in Head and Neck Microsurgery (2018)The Quality of Systematic Rev…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research (1987)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Eating Disorders (1985)Review articles: 2. The literature jungle. (1986)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. (1971)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews (2018)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Reviewing measures of outcome: reliability of data extraction (2004)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach (2012)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. (1968)Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta-review (2014)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Science, faith and society (1947)Truth Survival in Clinical Research: An Evidence-Based Requiem? (2002)Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities (2005)STORIES statement: Publication standards for healthcare education evidence synthesis (2014)The Myth of the Framework (2014)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Home Telemonitoring Interventions for Patients With Chronic Diseases: A Critical Assessment of Their Methodological Quality (2013)Qualidade metodológica das revisões sistemáticas em periódicos de psicologia brasileiros (2014)Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions (2017)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. (1996)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Meta-analysis as Evidence (2014)Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2017)Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews (2021)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2009AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews1,756 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews1,678 cited
  • 1992A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts1,517 cited
  • 1987The Medical Review Article: State of the Science857 cited
  • 2007External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR)569 cited
  • 2006Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews470 cited
  • 2009Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology – A systematic review78 cited
  • 1997Half-life of truth in surgical literature63 cited
  • 2010Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature From 1998 to 200855 cited
  • 2011Methodological Concerns and Quality Appraisal of Contemporary Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Pediatric Urology50 cited
  • 2010A Systematic Evaluation of the Quality of Meta-analyses in Endodontics49 cited
  • 2009Evidence-Based Plastic Surgery30 cited
  • 2013The Quality of Systematic Reviews in Hand Surgery

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

24 cited

Cited by

  • 2018The Quality of Systematic Reviews in Head and Neck Microsurgery6 cited