The Source and Credibility of Colorectal Cancer Information on Twitter

Sohyun Park · Heung‐Kwon Oh · Gibeom Park · Bongwon Suh · Woo Kyung Bae · Jin Won Kim +3 more

39 citations0/0 files storedMedicine

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Social Media in Health Education Misinformation and Its Impacts Health Literacy and Information Accessibility

Abstract

Despite the rapid penetration of social media in modern life, there has been limited research conducted on whether social media serves as a credible source of health information. In this study, we propose to identify colorectal cancer information on Twitter and assess its informational credibility. We collected Twitter messages containing colorectal cancer-related keywords, over a 3-month period. A review of sample tweets yielded content and user categorization schemes. The results of the sample analysis were applied to classify all collected tweets and users, using a machine learning technique. The credibility of the information in the sampled tweets was evaluated. A total of 76,119 tweets were analyzed. Individual users authored the majority of tweets (n = 68,982, 90.6%). They mostly tweeted about news articles/research (n = 16,761, 22.0%) and risk/prevention (n = 14,767, 19.4%). Medical professional users generated only 2.0% of total tweets (n = 1509), and medical institutions rarely tweeted (n = 417, 0.6%). Organizations tended to tweet more about information than did individuals (85.2% vs 63.1%; P < 0.001). Credibility analysis of medically relevant sample tweets revealed that most were medically correct (n = 1763, 84.5%). Among those, more frequently retweeted tweets contained more medically correct information than randomly selected tweets (90.7% vs 83.2%; P < 0.01). Our results demonstrate an interest in and an engagement with colorectal cancer information from a large number and variety of users. Coupled with the Internet's potential to increase social support, Twitter may contribute to enhancing public health and empowering users, when used with proper caution.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 39 citations exist upstream.

References

2006A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data 1996Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the kappa statistic 2009Social Media Use in the United States: Implications for Health Communication 2009Take Two Aspirin And Tweet Me In The Morning: How Twitter, Facebook, And Other Social Media Are Reshaping Health Care 2010Dissemination of health information through social networks: Twitter and antibiotics 2014The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis 2014Ebola, Twitter, and misinformation: a dangerous combination?2013Using Twitter for breast cancer prevention: an analysis of breast cancer awareness month

Cited by

2016How Twitter has connected the colorectal community 2016Social Media and Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN): Analysis of Advanced Metrics From the First Year of a New Twitter Community: #MPNSM 2025Quality of Cancer-Related Information on New Media (2014-2023): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.