Disability, Diversity, and Autism: Philosophical Perspectives on Health

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the connection between health and developmental disorders, particularly in regard to the notion of 'neurodiversity', which considers high-functioning autism not as a lifelong disability but a neurological form within a diversity of human minds. In recent years, autistic activist movements have called for a more positive, humanizing, identity-first language when describing this condition, rejecting negative language such as 'disorder', 'deficit', and 'impairment', and instead describing autism as a way of being, part of one's personal identity, which does not always need to be cured. Is a different form of neurodevelopment necessarily a degenerate one? Is well-being mostly affected by disability itself or by its being classified as abnormality? Drawing on philosophical insights, as well as autism research papers and popular science, I explore advantages and disadvantages of these classifications and the connections between health, autism, personhood, and disability.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 32 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.