Chaptergreen2008

How to open the door to System 2: Debiasing the Bat-and-Ball problem

Sacha Bourgeois‐Gironde · Jean‐Baptiste Van der Henst

24 citations0/0 files storedHAL

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Abstract

We investigate the empirical conditions under which participants overcome the intuitive and normatively wrong answers they produce in the bat-and-ball problem.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 24 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2016Developing expert political judgment: The impact of training and practice on judgmental accuracy in geopolitical forecasting.2014Numerals as triggers of System 1 and System 2 in the ‘bat and ball’ problem 2019Second-guess: Testing the specificity of error detection in the bat-and-ball problem 2022Metacognitive control in single- vs. dual-process theory 2014When intuitions are helpful: Prior beliefs can support reasoning in the bat-and-ball problem 2018The Flushtration Count Illusion: Attribute substitution tricks our interpretation of a simple visual event sequence 2023Examining the role of deliberation in de-bias training 2025System 2 and cognitive transparency: deliberation helps to justify sound intuitions during reasoning

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.