SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A comparison of handsearching versus EMBASE searching of the Annals of Saudi Medicine to identify reports of randomized controlled trials
14 references·1 citing·41 second hopsampled
A comparison of handsearching versus EMBASE searching of the Annals of Saudi Medicine to identify reports of randomized controlled trials (2006)A comparison of handsearching versus EMBA…Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials (2007)Handsearching versus electron…IRAN'S BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES' RESEARCH OUTPUT IN 2003: A BIBLIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF MEDLINE AND EXCERPTA MEDICA DATABASES (2005)IRAN'S BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES' R…The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)The inclusion of reports of r…Nearly half of dental randomized controlled trials published in German are not included in Medline (2002)Nearly half of dental randomi…Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study (2002)Direction and impact of langu…Development of The Cochrane Collaboration's Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (2002)Development of The Cochrane C…A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials (2002)A comparison of handsearching…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Identifying Randomised Trials (2001)Identifying Randomised Trials[The identification and description of clinical trials published in Spanish journals of general and internal medicine during the period of 1971-1995]. (1999)[The identification and descr…meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)meta-analysis bias in locatio…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifyi…A comparison of handsearching versus embase searching of the archives of Iranian medicine to identify reports of randomized controlled trials. (2006)A comparison of handsearching…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care (1993)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Meta-analysis of the literature or of individual patient data: is there a difference? (1993)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group (2009)THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES (2012)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)The Cochrane Collaboration (1995)Registering Clinical Trials (2003)Is the coverage of google scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews (2013)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews2,256 cited
  • 1998meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies1,370 cited
  • 2002Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study891 cited
  • 2003The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews499 cited
  • 2007Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials258 cited
  • 2002Development of The Cochrane Collaboration's Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials197 cited
  • 2002A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials117 cited
  • 2001Identifying Randomised Trials115 cited
  • 2002Nearly half of dental randomized controlled trials published in German are not included in Medline33 cited
  • 1999[The identification and description of clinical trials published in Spanish journals of general and internal medicine during the period of 1971-1995].

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

14 cited
  • 2005IRAN'S BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES' RESEARCH OUTPUT IN 2003: A BIBLIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF MEDLINE AND EXCERPTA MEDICA DATABASES8 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2006A comparison of handsearching versus embase searching of the archives of Iranian medicine to identify reports of randomized controlled trials.5 cited