SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan
8 references·16 citing·29 second hop
Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan (2016)Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/…A Program of Methodological Research to Arrive at the New International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol (2014)A Program of Methodological R…Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L Value Sets (2012)Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D…A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures (2009)A review of studies mapping (…EQ-5D value sets : inventory, comparative review, and user guide (2007)EQ-5D value sets : inventory,…The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 (2002)The estimation of a preferenc…Estimating an EQ‐5D population value set: the case of Japan (2002)Estimating an EQ‐5D populatio…Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States (1997)Modeling Valuations for EuroQ…EuroQol: the current state of play (1996)EuroQol: the current state of…Value Sets for EQ-5D-5L (2022)Value Sets for EQ-5D-5LEstimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for China (2022)Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Valu…Valuation Survey of EQ-5D-Y Based on the International Common Protocol: Development of a Value Set in Japan (2021)Valuation Survey of EQ-5D-Y B…Japanese Population Norms of EQ-5D-5L and Health Utilities Index Mark 3: Disutility Catalog by Disease and Symptom in Community Settings (2021)Japanese Population Norms of …Valuing Health State: An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Ethiopians (2019)Valuing Health State: An EQ-5…Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States in Poland: the First EQ-VT-Based Study in Central and Eastern Europe (2019)Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health …Normative Profile of Health-Related Quality of Life for Hong Kong General Population Using Preference-Based Instrument EQ-5D-5L (2019)Normative Profile of Health-R…Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L in Taiwan (2018)Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L in …The EQ-5D-5L Valuation study in Thailand (2018)The EQ-5D-5L Valuation study …One Method, Many Methodological Choices: A Structured Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments for Health State Valuation (2018)One Method, Many Methodologic…Eq5Dmap: A Command for Mapping between EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L (2018)Eq5Dmap: A Command for Mappin…EQ-5D-5L Valuation for the Malaysian Population (2018)EQ-5D-5L Valuation for the Ma…Choice Defines QALYs (2018)Choice Defines QALYsEQ-5D-5L versus EQ-5D-3L: The Impact on Cost Effectiveness in the United Kingdom (2017)EQ-5D-5L versus EQ-5D-3L: The…Assessing the Use of a Feedback Module to Model EQ-5D-5L Health States Values in Hong Kong (2017)Assessing the Use of a Feedba…Development of an Official Guideline for the Economic Evaluation of Drugs/Medical Devices in Japan (2016)Development of an Official Gu…EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life (1990)Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England (2017)EQ-SD: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group (2001)Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) (2011)EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and Future (2017)Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D (2005)Economic evaluation alongside randomised controlled trials: design, conduct, analysis, and reporting (2011)Valuation of the Child Health Utility 9D Index (2012)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1994)Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes (2005)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference? (2016)Theory of optimal experiments (1972)The EQ-5D-5L valuation study in Korea (2016)Is EQ-5D-5L Better Than EQ-5D-3L? A Head-to-Head Comparison of Descriptive Systems and Value Sets from Seven Countries (2018)United States Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States Using an International Protocol (2019)Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996)South Korean Time Trade-Off Values for EQ-5D Health States: Modeling with Observed Values for 101 Health States (2009)Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study (2012)An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Vietnam (2020)Danish population health measured by the EQ-5D-5L (2021)The Danish EQ-5D-5L Value Set: A Hybrid Model Using cTTO and DCE Data (2021)Chinese Time Trade-Off Values for EQ-5D Health States (2014)Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey (2014)A Systematic Review of Studies Comparing the Measurement Properties of the Three-Level and Five-Level Versions of the EQ-5D (2018)A Health Economics Approach to US Value Assessment Frameworks—Introduction: An ISPOR Special Task Force Report [1] (2018)Formal Implementation of Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations in Japan: A Unique Health Technology Assessment System (2019)Current Development and Practice of Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation Guidelines for Universal Health Coverage in China (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996EuroQol: the current state of play5,812 cited
  • 1997Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States4,543 cited
  • 2002The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-363,031 cited
  • 2012Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L Value Sets2,153 cited
  • 2002Estimating an EQ‐5D population value set: the case of Japan564 cited
  • 2009A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures517 cited
  • 2007EQ-5D value sets : inventory, comparative review, and user guide493 cited
  • 2014A Program of Methodological Research to Arrive at the New International EQ-5D-5L Valuation Protocol431 cited

Cited by

  • 2018The EQ-5D-5L Valuation study in Thailand205 cited
  • 2016Development of an Official Guideline for the Economic Evaluation of Drugs/Medical Devices in Japan154 cited
  • 2017Assessing the Use of a Feedback Module to Model EQ-5D-5L Health States Values in Hong Kong139 cited
  • 2021Japanese Population Norms of EQ-5D-5L and Health Utilities Index Mark 3: Disutility Catalog by Disease and Symptom in Community Settings116 cited
  • 2019Normative Profile of Health-Related Quality of Life for Hong Kong General Population Using Preference-Based Instrument EQ-5D-5L107 cited
  • 2019

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States in Poland: the First EQ-VT-Based Study in Central and Eastern Europe
103 cited
  • 2022Value Sets for EQ-5D-5L99 cited
  • 2019Valuing Health State: An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Ethiopians98 cited
  • 2017EQ-5D-5L versus EQ-5D-3L: The Impact on Cost Effectiveness in the United Kingdom89 cited
  • 2018One Method, Many Methodological Choices: A Structured Review of Discrete-Choice Experiments for Health State Valuation88 cited
  • 2018EQ-5D-5L Valuation for the Malaysian Population87 cited
  • 2021Valuation Survey of EQ-5D-Y Based on the International Common Protocol: Development of a Value Set in Japan81 cited
  • 2022Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for China71 cited
  • 2018Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L in Taiwan70 cited
  • 2018Eq5Dmap: A Command for Mapping between EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L59 cited
  • 2018Choice Defines QALYs58 cited