Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators: Rejoinder

6 references·15 citing·51 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2003Incentives and Invention in Universities461 cited
2006Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing?300 cited
1998Research Productivity in a System of Universities143 cited
2016A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators75 cited
2012An individual‐level assessment of the relationship between spin‐off activities and research performance in universities63 cited
n.d.A farewell to the MNCS and like size-independent indicators48 cited

Cited by

2016How long do top scientists maintain their stardom? An analysis by region, gender and discipline: evidence from Italy26 cited
2017An investigation on the skewness patterns and fractal nature of research productivity distributions at field and discipline level23 cited
2019Are all citations worth the same? Valuing citations by the value of the citing items21 cited
2018Research assessment by percentile-based double rank analysis17 cited
2019A novel methodology to assess the scientific standing of nations at field level16 cited
2018Research assessment by percentile-based double rank analysis15 cited
2018Technological research in the EU is less efficient than the world average. EU research policy risks Europeans’ future15 cited
2016

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

A comparison of university performance scores and ranks by MNCS and FSS

14 cited

2019Are all citations worth the same? Valuing citations by the value of the citing items13 cited

2021Scientometric‐based analysis in business and economics: Introduction, examples, and guidelines13 cited

2016From rankings to funnel plots: The question of accounting for uncertainty when assessing university research performance13 cited

2016A comparison of university performance scores and ranks by MNCS and FSS10 cited

2017An investigation on the skewness patterns and fractal nature of research productivity distributions at field and discipline level10 cited

2022Labor productivity, labor impact, and co-authorship of research institutions: publications and citations per full-time equivalents9 cited

2021Total number of papers and in a single percentile fully describes research impact—Revisiting concepts and applications8 cited