SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Investigation of bias in meta-analyses due to selective inclusion of trial effect estimates: empirical study
15 references·1 citing·46 second hop
Investigation of bias in meta-analyses due to selective inclusion of trial effect estimates: empirical study (2016)Investigation of bias in meta-analyses du…Methods to select results to include in meta-analyses deserve more consideration in systematic reviews (2015)Methods to select results to …How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care (2014)How to Read a Systematic Revi…Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials (2014)Evidence for the Selective Re…Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0 (2014)Developing Core Outcome Measu…Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions (2014)Bias due to selective inclusi…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…Many scenarios exist for selective inclusion and reporting of results in randomized trials and systematic reviews (2013)Many scenarios exist for sele…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …Multiplicity of data in trial reports and the reliability of meta-analyses: empirical study (2011)Multiplicity of data in trial…Establishing a Minimum Dataset for Prospective Registration of Systematic Reviews: An International Consultation (2011)Establishing a Minimum Datase…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and…Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews (2008)Attention should be given to …Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…Yet another problem with systematic reviews: a living review update (2024)Yet another problem with syst…Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes (1995)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain (2015)A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)Developing a Set of Core Outcomes for Trials in Hemodialysis: An International Delphi Survey (2017)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)Multiple outcomes and analyses in clinical trials create challenges for interpretation and research synthesis (2017)Collecting data (2019)Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (2017)Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis (2018)When continuous outcomes are measured using different scales: guide for meta-analysis and interpretation (2019)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems (2012)Basics of meta‐analysis: I 2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity (2017)Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Core outcome sets and systematic reviews (2016)Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors (2016)Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 2008Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses2,780 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2014Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0781 cited
  • 2014How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care454 cited
  • 2014Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions281 cited
  • 2014Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials187 cited
  • 2008Attention should be given to multiplicity issues in systematic reviews138 cited
  • 2011Establishing a Minimum Dataset for Prospective Registration of Systematic Reviews: An International Consultation96 cited
  • 2013Many scenarios exist for selective inclusion and reporting of results in randomized trials and systematic reviews78 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2011Multiplicity of data in trial reports and the reliability of meta-analyses: empirical study60 cited
  • 2015Methods to select results to include in meta-analyses deserve more consideration in systematic reviews22 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Yet another problem with systematic reviews: a living review update20 cited