SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Study sensitivity: Evaluating the ability to detect effects in systematic reviews of chemical exposures
8 references·7 citing·39 second hop
Study sensitivity: Evaluating the ability to detect effects in systematic reviews of chemical exposures (2016)Study sensitivity: Evaluating the ability…Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (2017)Assessing the Risk of Bias of…ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessin…Implementing systematic review techniques in chemical risk assessment: Challenges, opportunities and recommendations (2015)Implementing systematic revie…The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes (2014)The Navigation Guide Systemat…Systematic Review and Evidence Integration for Literature-Based Environmental Health Science Assessments (2014)Systematic Review and Evidenc…SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies (2014)SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool fo…Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Finding What Works in Health …Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)Conducting quantitative synth…Protocol for designing INVITES-IN, a tool for assessing the internal validity of in vitro studies (2023)Protocol for designing INVITE…Evidence Synthesis of Observational Studies in Environmental Health: Lessons Learned from a Systematic Review on Traffic-Related Air Pollution (2023)Evidence Synthesis of Observa…Systematic Reviews of Epidemiological Studies of Etiology and Prevalence (2022)Systematic Reviews of Epidemi…Evaluating reliability and risk of bias of in vivo animal data for risk assessment of chemicals – Exploring the use of the SciRAP tool in a systematic review context (2020)Evaluating reliability and ri…A novel study evaluation strategy in the systematic review of animal toxicology studies for human health assessments of environmental chemicals (2020)A novel study evaluation stra…Development of outcome-specific criteria for study evaluation in systematic reviews of epidemiology studies (2019)Development of outcome-specif…EFSA Scientific Colloquium 23 – Joint European Food Safety Authority and Evidence‐Based Toxicology Collaboration Colloquium Evidence integration in risk assessment: the science of combining apples and oranges 25–26 October 2017 Lisbon, Portugal (2018)EFSA Scientific Colloquium 23…Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)A risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: A users' guide to its application in the context of GRADE (2018)Facilitating healthcare decisions by assessing the certainty in the evidence from preclinical animal studies (2018)The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures (2018)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Tools for assessing risk of reporting biases in studies and syntheses of studies: a systematic review (2018)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Racism as a Determinant of Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2015)Mindfulness-based interventions for psychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2017)Meta-analyses of factors motivating climate change adaptation behaviour (2019)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Psychological treatments for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2015)Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study (2019)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology (2017)RoB-SPEO: A tool for assessing risk of bias in studies estimating the prevalence of exposure to occupational risk factors from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury (2019)Recommendations for the conduct of systematic reviews in toxicology and environmental health research (COSTER) (2020)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015)Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
  • 2014SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies4,393 cited
  • 2013Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews949 cited
  • 2011Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program728 cited
  • 2017Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions448 cited
  • 2014Systematic Review and Evidence Integration for Literature-Based Environmental Health Science Assessments433 cited
  • 2014The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes426 cited
  • 2015Implementing systematic review techniques in chemical risk assessment: Challenges, opportunities and recommendations92 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Development of outcome-specific criteria for study evaluation in systematic reviews of epidemiology studies21 cited
  • 2020Evaluating reliability and risk of bias of in vivo animal data for risk assessment of chemicals – Exploring the use of the SciRAP tool in a systematic review context21 cited
  • 2023Evidence Synthesis of Observational Studies in Environmental Health: Lessons Learned from a Systematic Review on Traffic-Related Air Pollution20 cited
  • 2018EFSA Scientific Colloquium 23 – Joint European Food Safety Authority and Evidence‐Based Toxicology Collaboration Colloquium Evidence integration in risk assessment: the science of combining apples and oranges 25–26 October 2017 Lisbon, Portugal

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

14 cited
  • 2020A novel study evaluation strategy in the systematic review of animal toxicology studies for human health assessments of environmental chemicals11 cited
  • 2023Protocol for designing INVITES-IN, a tool for assessing the internal validity of in vitro studies9 cited
  • 2022Systematic Reviews of Epidemiological Studies of Etiology and Prevalence8 cited