Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Loss to follow-up in orthopaedic clinical trials: a systematic review

9 references·2 citing·38 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2010CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials8,873 cited
2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
2003INTRODUCING LEVELS OF EVIDENCE TO THE JOURNAL1,298 cited
2011Introducing levels of evidence to the journal364 cited
2007Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials247 cited
2002THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000243 cited
2007The Quality of Reporting of Orthopaedic Randomized Trials with Use of a Checklist for Nonpharmacological Therapies85 cited

Cited by

2018Economic outcomes associated with deep surgical site infection in patients with an open fracture of the lower limb70 cited
2018Assessing quality of randomized trials supporting guidelines for laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery16 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work