No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
This paper analyzes time inconsistencies in the preferences of different actors involved in the decision-making that is related to the implementation of the Stockholm congestion-pricing scheme. The analysis of the procurement process indicates that there has been a total focus on the election period. In order to carry out the trial within the election period the process has been rushed and the trial period became very short (seven months). The short time period made it difficult to evaluate the trial and to communicate the results to the municipality citizens before the national elections and the local referendum concerning a permanent implementation of the system. The seemingly inappropriate timetable for the trial and referendum may be explained by information asymmetry allowing leading local politicians to anticipate the preference change that did occur in the public.
Loading…
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.