Two Mentorship Case Studies of High School and University Students with Disabilities: Milestones and Lessons

Abstract

As of 2003, over four million individuals aged 20 or under were experiencing a disability, representing approximately 15 percent of all same-aged individuals (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2003). This represents a slightly higher incidence of disability than the 12.6 percent of working-age adults reporting a disability in 2005 (StatsRRTC, 2005). However, of working-age adults with disabilities, only 38.1 percent reported working, with only 22.6 percent working full-time for the full year (StatsRRTC, 2005). Smith (2007) noted that persons with continue to experience notably lower rates of employment than persons without and that interventions are needed to impact these discrepancies. Mentorships are one example of an intervention aimed at decreasing risk factors and increasing the likelihood of success for persons with disabilities. Mentorships for individuals with have been widely advocated, although not well-researched (Coombs-Richardson, 2002; Powers, Sowers, & Stevens, 1995; Snowden, 2003; Sword & Hill, 2003; Whelley, Radtke, Burgstahler, & Christ, 2003; Wilson, 2003). DuBois and Rhodes (2006), in establishing a national research agenda for youth mentoring, called for best practice program descriptions that produce positive outcomes. purpose of this article is to describe two related, but independent mentorship programs for secondary and post-secondary students with disabilities. Descriptions on the recruitment, orientation, design, and evaluation of the two programs will be highlighted. Outcome data, where available, will be included. Purpose and Benefits of Mentorship Programs with Students with Disabilities Mentoring has been defined as a dyadic psychosocial intervention in which an older individual is brought into a close relationship with a younger person in order to provide support, guidance, and opportunities for social and academic development (Karcher, Nakkula, & Harris, 2005, p. 94). Mentoring relationships, or mentorships, are created in order to provide support and counsel to the mentee or protege in areas of academic, career, or social competence (Coombs-Richardson, 2002; Rhodes, Grossman, & Roffman, 2002) and increase the mentees' ability to navigate during a transition period (Karcher et al., 2005). Typical outcomes of mentorships include improved academic attendance and performance, improved self-worth and self-determination, and a close relationship with a positive adult role model that may be lacking in the lives of many mentees (Grossman & Rhodes, 2002; Hamilton & Hamilton, 2002; Karcher et al., 2005; Rhodes, Grossman, & Resch, 2000; Rhodes et al., 2002; Rhodes, Reddy, Roffman, & Grossman, 2005; Rhodes, Spencer, Keller, Liang, & Noam, 2006). The idea of mentoring is firmly rooted in the commonsense belief that it is good for a young person to have a close relationship with a caring older person, other than a parent, who can teach and advise and simply be an adult in her or his presence (Hamilton & Hamilton, 2002, p. 63). Not surprisingly, mentorships have been widely advocated for individuals with disabilities, emphasizing their need for positive role models who have successfully navigated the lived experience of a disability (Coombs-Richardson, 2002; Knight, 2000; Powers, Sowers, & Stevens, 1995; Snowden, 2003; Sword & Hill, 2003; Whelley et al., 2003; Wilson, 2003). Mentorships for individuals with are especially advocated during times of transition from high school to college as well as from post-secondary education to employment and careers (Snowden, 2003; U.S. Department of Labor, 2006; Whelley et al.; Wilson). The transition from K-12 education to the world of work or higher education is both a trying and exciting time for most young adults, but it can be particularly stressful for students with disabilities (Wilson, p. 2). Mentorship programs aimed at these periods are designed to ease transitional anxieties, improve social competence, and improve the disability-related skill set and motivation needed to succeed (Burgstahler, 2002, 2003, 2006; Coombs-Richardson; Powers et al. …

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.