SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluation of the highly-cited researchers’ database for a country: proposals for meaningful analyses on the example of Germany
0 references·6 citing·24 second hop
Evaluation of the highly-cited researchers’ database for a country: proposals for meaningful analyses on the example of Germany (2015)Evaluation of the highly-cited researcher…The definition of highly cited researchers: the effect of different approaches on the empirical outcome (2025)The definition of highly cite…In search of a scientific elite: highly cited researchers (HCR) in France (2023)In search of a scientific eli…On the advancement of highly cited research in China: An analysis of the Highly Cited database (2018)On the advancement of highly …Characteristics of highly cited researchers 2015 in Germany (2017)Characteristics of highly cit…What we learn from the shifts in highly cited data from 2001 to 2014? (2016)What we learn from the shifts…Distribution of women and men among highly cited scientists (2015)Distribution of women and men…Bias in peer review: a case study (2015)On the relationship between gender disparities in scholarly communication and country-level development indicators (2015)Research on women in science and higher education: a bibliometric analysis (2015)Women Authorship of Scholarly Publications in STEMM: Authorship Puzzle (2019)Gender of Highly Cited Researchers focused on the cross-filed category (2020)Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results (2007)h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields (2009)Does Interdisciplinary Research Lead to Higher Citation Impact? The Different Effect of Proximal and Distal Interdisciplinarity (2015)Do highly cited clinicians get more citations when being present at social networking sites? (2018)Macro-level indicators of the relations between research funding and research output (2009)Saudi Universities Offer Cash in Exchange for Academic Prestige (2011)China’s rise as a major contributor to science and technology (2014)The influence of Chinese scholars on global research (2022)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)A typology of peer-reviewers: role, characteristics, and egoistic and altruistic perspectives (2024)Gender gap in citations, h-index, and representation: Examining the highly cited authors across continents and disciplines in Google Scholar (2025)Little Science, Big Science (1963)The skewness of science (1992)Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications (2007)National-, institutional-, and individual-level determinants of dental research excellence: an analysis of Stanford–Elsevier lists of the top 2% scholars worldwide (2017–2023) (2025)Information Mining and Visualization of Highly Cited Papers on Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus from ESI (2019)Research Elite of Pakistan: Profile and Determinants of Productivity and Impact (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2018On the advancement of highly cited research in China: An analysis of the Highly Cited database15 cited
  • 2025The definition of highly cited researchers: the effect of different approaches on the empirical outcome13 cited
  • 2016What we learn from the shifts in highly cited data from 2001 to 2014?13 cited
  • 2017Characteristics of highly cited researchers 2015 in Germany13 cited
  • 2015Distribution of women and men among highly cited scientists12 cited
  • 2023In search of a scientific elite: highly cited researchers (HCR) in France8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work