SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Google Scholar Metrics 2014: a low cost bibliometric tool
3 references·2 citing·21 second hop
Google Scholar Metrics 2014: a low cost bibliometric tool (2014)Google Scholar Metrics 2014: a low cost b…The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators (2013)The G oogle scholar experimen…The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study (2013)The expansion of Google Schol…Google Scholar Metrics evolution: an analysis according to languages (2013)Google Scholar Metrics evolut…Gsm_hdata: a bibliometric tool to analyze data from google scholar metrics (2023)Gsm_hdata: a bibliometric too…Classic papers: using Google Scholar to detect the highly-cited documents (2018)Classic papers: using Google …Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication (2001)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level (2007)Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis (2011)Back to the past: on the shoulders of an academic search engine giant (2016)An Evidence-Based Review of Academic Web Search Engines, 2014-2016: Implications for Librarians’ Practice and Research Agenda (2017)How are excellent (highly cited) papers defined in bibliometrics? A quantitative analysis of the literature (2014)Can we use Google Scholar to identify highly-cited documents? (2016)Dimensions: redescubriendo el ecosistema de la información científica (2018)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2013The G oogle scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators292 cited
  • 2013The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study275 cited
  • 2013Google Scholar Metrics evolution: an analysis according to languages38 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Classic papers: using Google Scholar to detect the highly-cited documents7 cited
  • 2023Gsm_hdata: a bibliometric tool to analyze data from google scholar metrics5 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work