SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH
0 references·7 citing·29 second hop
COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH (2011)COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS FOR SYSTEMATIC REV…A suggested data structure for transparent and repeatable reporting of bibliographic searching (2022)A suggested data structure fo…Which are the most sensitive search filters to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE? (2020)Which are the most sensitive …Trial Registry Use in Surgery Systematic Reviews: A Cross-Sectional Study (2019)Trial Registry Use in Surgery…Systematic reviews with language restrictions and no author contact have lower overall credibility: a methodology study (2015)Systematic reviews with langu…Systematic Omics Analysis Review (SOAR) Tool to Support Risk Assessment (2014)Systematic Omics Analysis Rev…Toward Improved Evidence Standards and Methods for Rehabilitation: Recommendations and Challenges (2012)Toward Improved Evidence Stan…Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews: Survey of Editors of Core Clinical Journals (2012)Scientific Value of Systemati…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Conducting Systematic Evidence Reviews: Core Concepts and Lessons Learned (2012)Systematic overview of economic evaluations of health-related rehabilitation (2015)Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)Acceptance of a systematic review as a thesis: survey of biomedical doctoral programs in Europe (2017)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)Attitudes of editors of core clinical journals about whether systematic reviews are original research: a mixed-methods study (2019)The Informal Sector and Economic Growth of South Africa and Nigeria: A Comparative Systematic Review (2020)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)An analysis of psychotherapies delivered online and in person for patients with chronic pain: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. (2019)Pharmacologic Treatments for Sleep Disorders in Children: A Systematic Review (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cultural intelligence of expatriate workers: a systematic review (2021)Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews (2013)Identifying assessment criteria for in vitro studies: a method and item bank (2024)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Translation and validation of PubMed and Embase search filters for identification of systematic reviews, intervention studies, and observational studies in the field of first aid (2021)Avoiding searching for outcomes called for additional search strategies: a study of Cochrane review searches (2022)Development and evaluation of a search filter to identify prognostic factor studies in Ovid MEDLINE (2022)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The need to develop tailored tools for improving the quality of thematic bibliometric analyses: Evidence from papers published in Sustainability and Scientometrics (2023)Reproducibility and Data Storage for Active Learning-Aided Systematic Reviews (2024)Comparing Artificial Intelligence and manual methods in systematic review processes: protocol for a systematic review (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2012Scientific Value of Systematic Reviews: Survey of Editors of Core Clinical Journals64 cited
  • 2020Which are the most sensitive search filters to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE?59 cited
  • 2012Toward Improved Evidence Standards and Methods for Rehabilitation: Recommendations and Challenges32 cited
  • 2015Systematic reviews with language restrictions and no author contact have lower overall credibility: a methodology study30 cited
  • 2022A suggested data structure for transparent and repeatable reporting of bibliographic searching21 cited
  • 2014Systematic Omics Analysis Review (SOAR) Tool to Support Risk Assessment19 cited
  • 2019Trial Registry Use in Surgery Systematic Reviews: A Cross-Sectional Study13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work