How Cleveland Clinic used TDABC to improve value.

Christopher J Donovan · Mike Hopkins · Benjamin M Kimmel · Stephanie Koberna · Carrie A Montie

67 citations0/0 files storedPubMed

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Accounting and Organizational Management Healthcare Quality and Management Healthcare cost, quality, practices

Abstract

Cleveland Clinic partnered with Harvard Business School to conduct a pilot project to explore the differences between time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) and relative value unit costing. The goal was to determine whether TDABC could improve the accuracy of cost information and identify value-improvement opportunities for two types of heart-value procedures. Using TDABC, leaders gained a detailed look into process steps that could be consolidated, reduced, or performed with a lower cost mix of personnel.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 67 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2020A standardized framework to evaluate the quality of studies using TDABC in healthcare: the TDABC in Healthcare Consortium Consensus Statement 2025Global Adoption of Value-Based Health Care Initiatives Within Health Systems 2018Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing in Fracture Care: Is This a More Accurate Way to Prepare for Alternative Payment Models?2020Time-Driven activity-based costing identifies opportunities for process efficiency and cost optimization for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty 2016Understanding Time-driven Activity-based Costing 2019Capacity utilization analysis through time-driven ABC in a small-sized manufacturing company

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.