SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Coauthorship in pathology, a comparison with physics and a survery-generated and member-preferred authorship guideline.
12 references·1 citing·33 second hop
Coauthorship in pathology, a comparison with physics and a survery-generated and member-preferred authorship guideline. (2004)Coauthorship in pathology, a comparison w…Prevalence of Honorary and Ghost Authorship in Cochrane Reviews (2002)Prevalence of Honorary and Gh…Coauthorship in physics (2002)Coauthorship in physicsAuthorship for Research Groups (2002)Authorship for Research GroupsDoes Internet Research Work? (2000)Does Internet Research Work?The authorship list in science: Junior physicists’ perceptions of who appears and why (1999)The authorship list in scienc…Disclosure of Researcher Contributions: A Study of Original Research Articles in The Lancet (1999)Disclosure of Researcher Cont…Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Prevalence of Articles With H…Multiple Authorship (1998)Multiple AuthorshipWhen authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)When authorship fails. A prop…Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey (1996)Ethical issues in biomedical …Ethical Problems in Academic Research (1993)Ethical Problems in Academic …A pilot study of biomedical traineesʼ perceptions concerning research ethics (1992)A pilot study of biomedical t…Hyperauthorship: A comparative study of genetics and high-energy physics research (2019)Hyperauthorship: A comparativ…Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)A Critical Exploration of Face-to Face Interviewing vs. Computer-Mediated Interviewing (2001)The drop and collect survey among industrial populations: theory and empirical evidence (2004)Comparing Mail and Web-Based Survey Distribution Methods: Results of Surveys to Leisure Travel Retailers (2005)The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. (1973)Toward a theory of organizational socialization (1977)Management Science on the Credibility Bubble: Cardinal Sins and Various Misdemeanors (2010)Prevalence of Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2021)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers (1994)Authorship: time for a paradigm shift? (1997)Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study (2007)Perspective (2012)The Order of Authorship: Who's on First? (1990)The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism (2005)Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position (2010)Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective (2011)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration. Preparing, maintaining, and disseminating systematic reviews of the effects of health care (1995)Inflated numbers of authors over time have not been just due to increasing research complexity (2008)Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences (2010)Is Science Built on the Shoulders of Women? A Study of Gender Differences in Contributorship (2016)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)The Meaning of Author Order in Medical Research (2007)How to make more published research true (2015)Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors (2004)Effects of Author Contribution Disclosures and Numeric Limitations on Authorship Trends (2010)Authorship Protocols Must Change to Credit Citizen Scientists (2019)Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys (2014)Scientific Misconduct (2015)Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable566 cited
  • 1998Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals553 cited
  • 1993Ethical Problems in Academic Research246 cited
  • 2002Prevalence of Honorary and Ghost Authorship in Cochrane Reviews227 cited
  • 1998Multiple Authorship178 cited
  • 1999Disclosure of Researcher Contributions: A Study of Original Research Articles in The Lancet170 cited
  • 2000Does Internet Research Work?153 cited
  • 1992A pilot study of biomedical traineesʼ perceptions concerning research ethics137 cited
  • 1996Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey122 cited
  • 2002Authorship for Research Groups79 cited
  • 1999The authorship list in science: Junior physicists’ perceptions of who appears and why43 cited
  • 2002Coauthorship in physics29 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Hyperauthorship: A comparative study of genetics and high-energy physics research8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work