Analyzing matrices of meta‐analytic correlations: current practices and recommendations

Zitong Sheng · Wenmo Kong · José M. Cortina

57 citations0/0 files storedResearch Synthesis Methods

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

Researchers have become increasingly interested in conducting analyses on meta-analytic correlation matrices. Methodologists have provided guidance and recommended practices for the application of this technique. The purpose of this article is to review current practices regarding analyzing meta-analytic correlation matrices, to identify the gaps between current and best practices, and to offer a comprehensive set of recommendations regarding the planning, collection, analysis, and interpretation of studies that utilize meta-analytic correlation matrices. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 57 citations exist upstream.

References

2012Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling 1994Testing Structural Equation Models.1996Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.1991THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS 2002Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature.1975Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.2011False-Positive Psychology 2001Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.

Cited by

2022Personality and intelligence: A meta-analysis.2018Examining the Effects of Controlling for Shared Variance among the Dark Triad Using Meta–Analytic Structural Equation Modelling 2020Recommendations for Reviewing Meta-Analyses in Organizational Research 2017Accounting for Missing Correlation Coefficients in Fixed-Effects MASEM 2018Some reflections on combining meta‐analysis and structural equation modeling 2025

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.