SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
search.bioPreprint: a discovery tool for cutting edge, preprint biomedical research articles
12 references·0 citing·45 second hop
search.bioPreprint: a discovery tool for cutting edge, preprint biomedical research articles (2016)search.bioPreprint: a discovery tool for …Towards an open science publishing platform (2016)Towards an open science publi…Rewarding reviewers – sense or sensibility? A Wiley study explained (2016)Rewarding reviewers – sense o…Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR)…Open journals that piggyback on arXiv gather momentum (2016)Open journals that piggyback …Does it take too long to publish research? (2016)Does it take too long to publ…Biologists urged to hug a preprint (2016)Biologists urged to hug a pre…Time for a prepublication culture in clinical research? (2015)Time for a prepublication cul…Open peer review at four STEM journals: an observational overview (2015)Open peer review at four STEM…Accelerating scientific publication in biology (2015)Accelerating scientific publi…The Case for Open Preprints in Biology (2013)The Case for Open Preprints i…Preprints come to life (2013)Preprints come to lifeExploring a New Model for Preprint Server: A Case Study of CSPO (2010)Exploring a New Model for Pre…ArXiv at 20 (2011)Git can facilitate greater reproducibility and increased transparency in science (2013)Best Practices for Scientific Computing (2014)Medical Preprints—A Debate Worth Having (2017)Envisioning the scientific paper of the future (2020)PreprintMatch: A tool for preprint to publication detection shows global inequities in scientific publication (2023)Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance (2004)Defining and Characterizing Open Peer Review: A Review of the Literature (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Free‐to‐publish, free‐to‐read, or both? Cost, equality of access, and integrity in science publishing (2016)Preserving the Quality of Scientific Research: Peer Review of Research Articles (2017)Critical essay: Blinding faith – Paradoxes and pathologies of opacity in peer review (2021)Preprints for the life sciences (2016)Genetical Implications of the Structure of Deoxyribonucleic Acid (2017)On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective (2019)Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints (2019)The Ingelfinger Rule Revisited (1991)Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators (2013)Preprint manuscripts and servers in the era of coronavirus disease 2019 (2020)Consistency of covid-19 trial preprints with published reports and impact for decision making: retrospective review (2022)What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal? (1998)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews (2016)Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers (2017)Ten considerations for open peer review (2018)Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct (1990)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)Should there be greater use of preprint servers for publishing reports of biomedical science? (2016)Who and why do researchers opt to publish in post-publication peer review platforms? - findings from a review and survey of F1000 Research (2018)The relationship of polarity of post-publication peer review to citation count (2020)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields (2017)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists (2019)Formatting Open Science: agilely creating multiple document formats for academic manuscripts with Pandoc Scholar (2017)Preprints and Scholarly Communication: Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers (2019)Reporting COVID-19 preprints: fast science in newspapers in the United States, the United Kingdom and Brazil (2022)Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AI in the research process (2021)Addressing Reproducibility: Peer Review, Impact Factors, Checklists, Guidelines, and Reproducibility Initiatives (2017)Praxishandbuch Open Access (2017)A new paradigm for the scientific enterprise: nurturing the ecosystem (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level499 cited
  • 2016Does it take too long to publish research?267 cited
  • 2015Accelerating scientific publication in biology207 cited
  • 2016Rewarding reviewers – sense or sensibility? A Wiley study explained124 cited
  • 2013The Case for Open Preprints in Biology74 cited
  • 2015Time for a prepublication culture in clinical research?44 cited
  • 2016Towards an open science publishing platform34 cited
  • 2013Preprints come to life31 cited
  • 2015Open peer review at four STEM journals: an observational overview29 cited
  • 2016Biologists urged to hug a preprint19 cited
  • 2016Open journals that piggyback on arXiv gather momentum14 cited
  • 2010Exploring a New Model for Preprint Server: A Case Study of CSPO13 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work