Articlegreen2016

An AHP-Topsis Integrated Model for Selecting the Most Appropriate Tomography Equipment

Miguel Angel Ortiz Barrios · Fabio De Felice · Kevin Parra Negrete · Brandon Aleman Romero · Adriana Yaruro Arenas · Antonella Petrillo

81 citations0/0 files storedInternational Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Multi-Criteria Decision Making Decision Support System Applications Strategic Planning and Analysis

Abstract

Selecting a suitable Multi Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method is a crucial step in selecting appropriate medical equipment. The aim of the research is to define the most appropriate tomography equipment through the integration of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. A hybrid model is presented. The AHP is used to define the weights of each criterion and sub-criterion through qualitative comparisons. Then, TOPSIS is used to evaluate the purchase options. This research provides decision makers with a scientific and rigorous decision support system useful in strategic and complex decision. A numerical example is also presented.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 81 citations exist upstream.

References

1977A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures 2008Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process 1981Multiple Attribute Decision Making 2005Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys 1996Decision making with dependence and feedback : the analytic network process 1985Note—A Preference Ranking Organisation Method 1994Analytical hierarchy process 2013An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods

Cited by

2019Multi-agent learning neural network and Bayesian model for real-time IoT skin detectors: a new evaluation and benchmarking methodology 2022Financial performance evaluation by multi-criteria decision-making techniques 2019Multi-Criteria Evaluation and Benchmarking for Young Learners’ English Language Mobile Applications in Terms of LSRW Skills 2020Novel Triplex Procedure for Ranking the Ability of Software Engineering Students Based on Two levels of AHP and Group TOPSIS Techniques 2021Wastewater treatment technology selection using a hybrid multicriteria decision‐making method

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.