SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Why do we need Evidence-Based Methods in Cochrane?
16 references·1 citing·50 second hop
Why do we need Evidence-Based Methods in Cochrane? (2015)Why do we need Evidence-Based Methods in …The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method (2014)The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkm…Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions (2014)Bias due to selective inclusi…Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE (2013)Search strategies to identify…Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? (2013)Methodological developments i…Methods for obtaining unpublished data (2011)Methods for obtaining unpubli…Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews (2011)Checking reference lists to f…Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis (2011)Characteristics of meta-analy…User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews (2010)User testing and stakeholder …Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleve…Retrieving randomized controlled trials from medline : a comparison of 38 published search filters (2009)Retrieving randomized control…Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials (2007)Handsearching versus electron…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies (2006)A comparison of heterogeneity…Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes (2002)Issues in the selection of a …Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records (2002)Identification of randomized …Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…Artificial Intelligence Tools for Automating Evidence Synthesis: Scoping Review (2025)Artificial Intelligence Tools…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Searching for studies: a guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews (2017)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2018)Intersectionality in quantitative health disparities research: A systematic review of challenges and limitations in empirical studies (2021)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)Predictive distributions for between‐study heterogeneity and simple methods for their application in Bayesian meta‐analysis (2014)A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)Music therapy for stress reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited (2015)Plea for routinely presenting prediction intervals in meta-analysis (2016)Socioeconomic status and the 25 × 25 risk factors as determinants of premature mortality: a multicohort study and meta-analysis of 1·7 million men and women (2017)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Small studies are more heterogeneous than large ones: a meta-meta-analysis (2015)A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes (2018)Bias caused by sampling error in meta-analysis with small sample sizes (2018)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)MISINTERPRETATION AND MISUSE OF THE KAPPA STATISTIC (1987)The impact of child sexual abuse on health: A systematic review of reviews (2009)The unity and diversity of executive functions: A systematic review and re-analysis of latent variable studies. (2018)Access to specialty healthcare in urban versus rural US populations: a systematic literature review (2019)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology (2016)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis (2001)Systematic Reviews in Health Care. Meta-analysis in Context. (2002)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)NICE DSU Technical Support Document 2: A Generalised Linear Modelling Framework for Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials (2011)Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions (2013)Core outcome sets and systematic reviews (2016)Implementing PRISMA-P: recommendations for prospective authors (2016)Methodological Standards for Meta-Analyses and Qualitative Systematic Reviews of Cardiac Prevention and Treatment Studies: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 2014The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method2,401 cited
  • 2010Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?1,185 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2002Issues in the selection of a summary statistic for meta‐analysis of clinical trials with binary outcomes660 cited
  • 2011Checking reference lists to find additional studies for systematic reviews445 cited
  • 2011Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis403 cited
  • 2006A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies379 cited
  • 2002Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records340 cited
  • 2014Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions281 cited
  • 2007Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials247 cited
  • 2013Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE145 cited
  • 2010User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

127 cited
  • 2009Retrieving randomized controlled trials from medline : a comparison of 38 published search filters126 cited
  • 2013Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?112 cited
  • 2011Methods for obtaining unpublished data107 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Artificial Intelligence Tools for Automating Evidence Synthesis: Scoping Review9 cited