Same Contract, Different Day? An Analysis of Teacher Bargaining Agreements in Louisville since 1979

Joshua M. Cowen · Jacob T. Fowles

26 citations0/0 files storedTeachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Labor Movements and Unions School Choice and Performance Politics, Economics, and Education Policy

Abstract

Background/Context Recent political efforts to minimize the influence of teacher unions have called new attention to collective bargaining in American education. Such attention has only heightened a longstanding controversy within the realms of both research and practice. A renewed scholarly literature has systematically considered the relationship between teacher unionization and educational outcomes. The current paper provides additional context for such work by considering teacher contracts over time. Purpose/Objective/Research Question In this study we examine the ways in which the collective bargaining agreements in a large, Midwestern American school district have changed during more than 30 years of policymaking. Research Design The paper presents an historical content analysis/case study of every contract in Louisville, Kentucky since 1979. We focus on several areas of current interest to researchers studying teacher quality. These include salary schedules, transfer and assignment policies, teacher evaluation, dismissal, and working conditions. To fix our analysis within a theoretical framework, we consider an interpretation of our evidence suggested by the perspective of New Institutionalism. Conclusions/Recommendations We show that these contracts have changed very little in more than three decades, and most key provisions are identical. The time period we examine covers important educational reforms at the state and federal levels, as well as a number of popular movements such as efforts to reduce class size and enhance teacher quality through new evaluation schemes and tenure reform. If confirmed in other districts, our evidence would suggest limited potential for policy change to be reflected in individual bargaining agreements.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 26 citations exist upstream.

References

1977Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony 1991The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis 1990Rediscovering institutions: the organizational basis of politics 1946From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology 1996Tinkering toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform.2004Why Public Schools Lose Teachers 2006Teacher-Student Matching and the Assessment of Teacher Effectiveness 1999Modeling the Impact of Public Management: Implications of Structural Context

Cited by

2020Teachers’ Unions, Collective Bargaining, and the Response to COVID-19 2017Cut From the Same Cloth? Comparing Urban District CBAs Within States and Across the United States 2017THE WAGE IMPACT OF TEACHERS UNIONS: A META‐ANALYSIS 2014Collective Bargaining Agreement Provisions in the Wake of Ohio Teacher Evaluation System Legislation 2021Public School Teacher Contracts and State-Level Reforms: Assessing Changes to Collective Bargaining Restrictiveness Across Three States

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.