SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essential Science for Prevention
8 references·4 citing·48 second hop
Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essential Science for Prevention (2015)Evidence from Toxicology: The Most Essent…The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes (2014)The Navigation Guide Systemat…Systematic Review and Evidence Integration for Literature-Based Environmental Health Science Assessments (2014)Systematic Review and Evidenc…Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Increasing value and reducing…Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Published Animal Studies: A Systematic Review (2013)Instruments for Assessing Ris…Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Application of systematic rev…Weight of Evidence: A Review of Concept and Methods (2005)Weight of Evidence: A Review …Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? (2004)Can the pharmaceutical indust…The Cochrane Collaboration: Evaluation of Health Care and Services Using Systematic Reviews of the Results of Randomized Controlled Trials (1998)The Cochrane Collaboration: E…Assessing the quality of evidence in studies estimating prevalence of exposure to occupational risk factors: The QoE-SPEO approach applied in the systematic reviews from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury (2022)Assessing the quality of evid…Reviews in environmental health: How systematic are they? (2021)Reviews in environmental heal…Assessor burden, inter-rater agreement and user experience of the RoB-SPEO tool for assessing risk of bias in studies estimating prevalence of exposure to occupational risk factors: An analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury (2021)Assessor burden, inter-rater …Weight of Evidence for Hazard Identification: A Critical Review of the Literature (2018)Weight of Evidence for Hazard…The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs (2003)How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge (2010)Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency (2012)Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs (2014)Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process (1983)Best evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis (1995)Interpreting epidemiological evidence: how meta-analysis and causal inference methods are related (2000)Use of Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Support Weight of Evidence Evaluation (2011)About and beyond leading uniqueness and belongingness: A systematic review of inclusive leadership research (2022)Modern Epidemiology 3rd edition (1986)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? (2011)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (2017)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes (2018)ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps (2018)A tool to assess risk of bias in non-randomized follow-up studies of exposure effects (ROBINS-E) (2024)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies (2014)A Comparison of Results of Meta-analyses of Randomized Control Trials and Recommendations of Clinical Experts (1992)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Uses and abuses of meta-analysis (2001)A Brief History of Research Synthesis (2002)Development of The Cochrane Collaboration's Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials (2002)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Facilitating healthcare decisions by assessing the certainty in the evidence from preclinical animal studies (2018)The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures (2018)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences (2016)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)A Survey of Systematic Evidence Mapping Practice and the Case for Knowledge Graphs in Environmental Health and Toxicology (2020)Systematic Review and Weight of Evidence Are Integral to Ecological and Human Health Assessments: They Need an Integrated Framework (2020)Applying Bradford Hill to assessing causality in systematic reviews: A transparent approach using process tracing (2024)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Improving the quality of toxicology and environmental health systematic reviews: What journal editors can do (2021)Systems for rating bodies of evidence used in systematic reviews of air pollution exposure and reproductive and children’s health: a methodological survey (2024)Expert perspectives on exposure-response functions for urban health policy: Lessons from a UBDPolicy workshop (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates?4,230 cited
  • 2014Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis1,597 cited
  • 2010Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making695 cited
  • 1998The Cochrane Collaboration: Evaluation of Health Care and Services Using Systematic Reviews of the Results of Randomized Controlled Trials465 cited
  • 2014Systematic Review and Evidence Integration for Literature-Based Environmental Health Science Assessments438 cited
  • 2014The Navigation Guide Systematic Review Methodology: A Rigorous and Transparent Method for Translating Environmental Health Science into Better Health Outcomes426 cited
  • 2005Weight of Evidence: A Review of Concept and Methods419 cited
  • 2013Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Published Animal Studies: A Systematic Review154 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Weight of Evidence for Hazard Identification: A Critical Review of the Literature45 cited
  • 2021Reviews in environmental health: How systematic are they?19 cited
  • 2022Assessing the quality of evidence in studies estimating prevalence of exposure to occupational risk factors: The QoE-SPEO approach applied in the systematic reviews from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury13 cited
  • 2021Assessor burden, inter-rater agreement and user experience of the RoB-SPEO tool for assessing risk of bias in studies estimating prevalence of exposure to occupational risk factors: An analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

12 cited