Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Rise of Predatory Publishing: How To Avoid Being Scammed

10 references·5 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
2015‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics818 cited
2002The history of the peer-review process445 cited
2013Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing349 cited
2009The Thomson Reuters Journal Selection Process165 cited
2014Publishers withdraw more than 120 gibberish papers129 cited
2011A Study of Innovative Features in Scholarly Open Access Journals82 cited
2015Spurious alternative impact factors: The scale of the problem from an academic perspective68 cited
2015How to hijack a journal36 cited

Cited by

2023Distance education as a tool to improve researchers’ knowledge on predatory journals in countries with limited resources: the Moroccan experience26 cited
2019Academics and the Field of Academic Publishing: Challenges and Approaches21 cited
2019How can a questionable journal be identified: Frameworks and checklists20 cited
2019Rewarding the quantity of peer review could harm biomedical research16 cited
2024A harm reduction approach to improving peer review by acknowledging its imperfections

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

8 cited