No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
The early pioneering studies of both Chartism and trade unionism presented a picture of two very separate almost hermetic movements. 1 More recently it has been shown that there was substantial trade union participation in Chartism in London and Scotland. 2 Yet the assumption that the connections between the two movements were minimal and unimportant remains widespread. 3 This proposition in fact forms a central part of what has been called a ‘compartmentalist’ or ‘reductionist’ approach to early working-class history. 4 This emphasises the essential separation of various strands of working-class activity, and extent of sectionalism, in order to question the extent of working-class consciousness and working-class support for Chartism. 5 This viewpoint dovetails with a conception of the social composition of Chartism, similarly rooted in the pioneering studies, as essentially a movement of the most depressed outworkers, with the skilled workers in their unions being absent and aloof. 6 In Lancashire Chartism is thus portrayed as quintessentially a movement of the handloom weavers, with the factory workers at best lukewarm and the other trades largely ignored. 7 In consequence, in the momentous Plug Strikes, the 1842 general strike, the evident confluence of Chartists, trade unionists and factory workers has been seen as a novel development, and a momentary aberration. 8 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 11 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.