Articlehybrid2016

Imagining wildlife: New technologies and animal censuses, maps and museums

Audrey Verma · René van der Wal · Anke Fischer

77 citations0/0 files storedGeoforum

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Geographies of human-animal interactions Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies

Abstract

By enabling the creation of networks of electronic sensors and human participants, new technologies have shaped the ways in which conservation-related organisations monitor wildlife. These networks enable the capture of data perceived as necessary to evidence conservation strategies and foster public support. We collected interview and archival data from UK-based conservation organisations with regard to their use of digital technologies for wildlife monitoring. As a conceptual device to examine these efforts, we used Benedict Anderson’s (1991) work on censuses, maps and museums as social instruments that enabled the imagining of communities. Through a critical application of this framework, the technologically-aided acquisition of wildlife data was shown to inform the new ways in which conservation organisations identify and quantify wildlife, conceptualise animal spaces, and curate conservation narratives. In so defining, delineating and displaying the non-human animal world with the backing of organisational authority, new technologies aid in the representational construction of animal censuses, maps and museums. In terms of practice, large amounts of new data can now be gathered and processed more cost-effectively. However, the use of technologies may also be the result of pressures on organisations to legitimise conservation by being seen as innovative and popular. Either way, human participants are relegated to supporting rather than participatory roles. At a more abstract level, the scale of surveillance associated with instrumentation can be read as an exercise of human dominance. Nonetheless, new technologies present conservation organisations with the means necessary for defending wildlife against exploitation.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 77 citations exist upstream.

References

1998Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed 1995Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the Third World 1995Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World.1997The Politics of Environmental Discourse 1998Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed 1995Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism 1988The pasteurization of France 1989The Pasteurization of France

Cited by

2021Wildlife in the Digital Anthropocene: Examining human-animal relations through surveillance technologies 2021The implications of digital visual media for human–nature relationships 2020Quarantine encounters with digital animals: More-than-human geographies of lockdown life 2018Lupine Becomings—Tracking and Assembling Romanian Wolves through Multi-Sensory Fieldwork 2024Digital natures: New ontologies, new politics?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.