4. Strong generative capacity of RST, SDRT and discourse dependency DAGSs

Laurence Danlos

25 citations0/0 files storedPragmatics & beyond. New series

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation Linguistics and Discourse Analysis Discourse Analysis in Language Studies

Abstract

The aim of this paper0 is to compare the discourse structures proposed in rst, sdrt and dependency dags which extend the semantic level of mtt for discourses. The key question is the following: do these formalisms allow the representation of all the discourse structures which correspond to felicitous discourses and exclude those which correspond to infelicitous discourses? Hence the term of “strong generative capacity” taken from formal grammars.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

References

1988Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization 1993From Discourse to Logic 1987Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice 1993Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse 2003Logics of conversation 1979Coherence and Coreference*1985Coordination and how to distinguish categories 1988The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’

Cited by

2013Prosodic correlates of discourse boundaries and hierarchy in discourse production

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.