Audience Perceptions of Politeness and Advocacy Skills in the 2000 and 2004 Presidential Debates

Abstract

Two studies, of the 2000 and 2004 presidential debates, were conducted to determine the extent to which audience members relied on constructs of politeness or advocacy skills to evaluate candidates' messages in debates. Results from pre-debate responses as to the importance of these skills and post-debate judgments of the quality of those skills indicated that, above and beyond loyalty to a candidate, both advocacy and politeness played a role in audience members' evaluations of the candidates. While advocacy skills appeared to be more salient, politeness still played a significant role. The findings confirm the need for more descriptive, ethnographic, and scientific studies to determine how politeness and advocacy skills are related in audience assessments of candidates in debates.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 22 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.